¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: freedom

When should I really use noexcept?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10787766/when-should-i-really-use-noexcept

Personally I care about noexcept because the of increased freedom provided to the compiler to safely apply certain kinds of optimizations... Personally I care about noexcept because the of increased freedom provided to the compiler to safely apply certain kinds of optimizations...

Why can't you use offsetof on non-POD strucutures in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1129894/why-cant-you-use-offsetof-on-non-pod-strucutures-in-c

simple memory model supporting C it would take a lot of freedom away from C compiler implementors how to organize class instance..

Why can member variables not be used as defaults for parameters? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13678627/why-can-member-variables-not-be-used-as-defaults-for-parameters

like an excessive requirement which restricts the typical freedom of evaluation order that we are used to seeing in C . Note that..

What exactly is the “as-if” rule?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15718262/what-exactly-is-the-as-if-rule

are allowed. The goal is to give implementations freedom to perform optimizations as long as the behavior of the program..

What could C/C++ “lose” if they defined a standard ABI?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2083060/what-could-c-c-lose-if-they-defined-a-standard-abi

ABI c c standards abi share improve this question The freedom to implement things in the most natural way on each processor...

Is it reasonable to use std::basic_string<t> as a contiguous buffer when targeting C++03?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2256160/is-it-reasonable-to-use-stdbasic-stringt-as-a-contiguous-buffer-when-targeti

for modern compilers that actually take advantage of this freedom. For example if one wants to use basic_string to receive the.. way how may compilers actually take advantage of the freedom having noncontiguous memory allows EDIT I updated this question..

Why do C++ streams use char instead of unsigned char?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/277655/why-do-c-streams-use-char-instead-of-unsigned-char

not unsigned char . This gives implementations a bit more freedom to do the best thing on the platform for example the standards..

Creating an object in the loop

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3009489/creating-an-object-in-the-loop

Minimizing the scope of a variable gives the compiler more freedom for register allocation and other optimizations and at least..

New to C++, help me get started

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3504238/new-to-c-help-me-get-started

opposed to Java is that it contains a hell of a lot more freedom than Java especially as regards to templates vs generics the..

How do I export templated classes from a dll without explicit specification?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/362822/how-do-i-export-templated-classes-from-a-dll-without-explicit-specification

the template. This is the only way to give users the freedom to use any type with the template but in a sense it's working..

Why was std::pow(double, int) removed from C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5627030/why-was-stdpowdouble-int-removed-from-c11

about all of those bits down at the low end. So while the freedom is there to shuffle pow double int off to a separate algorithm..

Polymorphism in c++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5854581/polymorphism-in-c

calls. As is typical in C the programmer is given a lot of freedom to control the boundaries within which polymorphism is used...

Is short-circuiting boolean operators mandated in C/C++? And evaluation order?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/628526/is-short-circuiting-boolean-operators-mandated-in-c-c-and-evaluation-order

functions will have been called but the compiler has freedom in selecting the most efficient order. Does the standard indicate..

“Observable behaviour” and compiler freedom to eliminate/transform pieces c++ code

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6664471/observable-behaviour-and-compiler-freedom-to-eliminate-transform-pieces-c-co

Observable behaviour&rdquo and compiler freedom to eliminate transform pieces c code After reading this discussion.. of part 1.9 of the Standard addressing implementation freedom is so called as if rule an implementation is free to disregard..

C++ or C# to program mobile barcode device?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/708484/c-or-c-sharp-to-program-mobile-barcode-device

can learn other GUI frameworks if I have to. That gives me freedom to choose a language any recommendations one way or another..

What does `std::kill_dependency` do, and why would I want to use it?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7150395/what-does-stdkill-dependency-do-and-why-would-i-want-to-use-it

Can standard container templates be instantiated with incomplete types?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8329826/can-standard-container-templates-be-instantiated-with-incomplete-types

understanding this restriction is just for expanding the freedom of the implementation of standard containers. So as Kerrek SB..