c# Programming Glossary: dangerous

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1051838/killing-a-thread-c

this question Do not call Thread.Abort Thread.Abort is dangerous. Instead you should cooperate with the thread so that it can..

What's wrong with using Thread.Abort()

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1559255/whats-wrong-with-using-thread-abort

indicative of bad design possibly unreliable and extremely dangerous. It should be avoided at all costs the only time you should..

C# cleanest way to write retry logic?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1563191/c-sharp-cleanest-way-to-write-retry-logic

catch statements that simply retry the same call can be dangerous if used as a general exception handling mechanism. Having said..

Silent failures in C#, seemingly unhandled exceptions that does not crash the program

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1583351/silent-failures-in-c-seemingly-unhandled-exceptions-that-does-not-crash-the-pr

event. I'm sure there is no need to explain how ugly and dangerous this is. I was wondering nonetheless in the probably history..

Should I learn VB.NET or C#? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1653895/should-i-learn-vb-net-or-c

to make Option Strict Off the default setting encouraging dangerous loose typing in some places if you ever touch VB never use Option..

Abuse of C# lambda expressions or Syntax brilliance?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1718037/abuse-of-c-sharp-lambda-expressions-or-syntax-brilliance

is very expressive indeed but at the same time very dangerous. The general use of lambda expressions allows for replacement..

Multiple/single instance of Linq to SQL DataContext

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/226127/multiple-single-instance-of-linq-to-sql-datacontext

service... Summarized your options are Global DataContext dangerous in multi threaded environments including web apps . Remember..

Get name of property as a string

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2820660/get-name-of-property-as-a-string

simplify the ExposeProperty method. Polishing doorknobs is dangerous work... Thanks everyone. c# reflection properties share improve..

Do event handlers stop garbage collection from occuring?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/298261/do-event-handlers-stop-garbage-collection-from-occuring

collected. Static events however for this reason are very dangerous when used with instance based handlers. share improve this..

why do we need the new keyword and why is the default behavior to hide and not override?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3117838/why-do-we-need-the-new-keyword-and-why-is-the-default-behavior-to-hide-and-not-o

and not overriding the default Because virtual override is dangerous . Virtual override allows derived classes to change the behaviour.. that was compiled to use base classes. Doing something dangerous like making an override should be something you do consciously..

Calling virtual method in base class constructor

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/448258/calling-virtual-method-in-base-class-constructor

a virtual method from a base class constructor can be dangerous since the child class might not be in a valid state. at least.. Calling a virtual method in a constructor is indeed dangerous but sometimes it can end up with the cleanest code. I would..

Is the ++ operator thread safe? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4628243/is-the-operator-thread-safe

are still too slow only then should you consider going to dangerous low lock techniques. The common low lock technique to use here..

Why is TypedReference behind the scenes? It's so fast and safe… almost magical!

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4764573/why-is-typedreference-behind-the-scenes-its-so-fast-and-safe-almost-magical

letting you write very high performance generic code. It's dangerous if you don't know what you're doing but very worth if you do...

C# version of java's synchronized keyword?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/541194/c-sharp-version-of-javas-synchronized-keyword

of code like so public synchronized void doImportantStuff dangerous code goes here. or public void doImportantStuff trivial stuff.. or public void doImportantStuff trivial stuff synchronized dangerous code goes here. c# java multithreading synchronization share..

A potentially dangerous Request.Path value was detected from the client (*)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5967103/a-potentially-dangerous-request-path-value-was-detected-from-the-client

potentially dangerous Request.Path value was detected from the client I am recieving.. recieving the rather self explanatory error A potentially dangerous Request.Path value was detected from the client . the issue..

Globally catch exceptions in a WPF application?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/793100/globally-catch-exceptions-in-a-wpf-application

I know that blindly ignoring certain classes of errors is dangerous and might corrupt my application instance. As said before this..

Are C# uninitalized variables dangerous?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8931226/are-c-sharp-uninitalized-variables-dangerous

C# uninitalized variables dangerous I'm familiar with the C# spec section 5.3 which says that a..