python Programming Glossary: substantially

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1418588/how-expensive-are-python-dictionaries-to-handle

is amortized O 1 and so forth. Can't really do anything substantially better for any non tiny container For tiny containers you can..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/172306/how-are-you-planning-on-handling-the-migration-to-python-3

right before spending time on getting it ported over to a substantially new version of the language. This potentially includes sponsors..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2119761/simple-python-challenge-fastest-bitwise-xor-on-data-buffers

are two 1 megabyte 2 20 byte strings. The challenge is to substantially beat my inefficient algorithm using python or existing third..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2211990/how-to-implement-an-efficient-infinite-generator-of-prime-numbers-in-python

for the authors' names I guess and somebody proposed a substantially faster but IMHO less clear version . share improve this answer..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2646157/what-is-the-fastest-to-access-struct-like-object-in-python

be sequence like hence my choice of namedtuple. Lists are substantially faster but constant keys are unmaintainable I'd have to create..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3111195/python-performance-try-except-or-not-in

loop this shows that with 10 missing keys the in check is substantially the fastest way. python mtimeit s'import dil dil.make 1 ' 'dil.with_in..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3247833/how-to-check-arguments-of-the-function

recommend eschewing the decorator approach which would be substantially more complicated for such specialized uses . So here is all..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/464342/combining-two-sorted-lists-in-python

it against ghoseb's solution and sorted l1 l2 is substantially quicker merge_sorted_lists took.. 9.7439379692077637 9.8844599723815918..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7063420/perl-compatible-regular-expression-pcre-in-python

in patterns and strings. Worse these disparities vary substantially according not just to which version of Python you are using..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8514020/marshal-dumps-faster-cpickle-loads-faster

version independence is guaranteed and pickle supports a substantially wider range of objects than marshal. the python docs about marshal..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/932222/implementing-the-koch-curve

up into a class but I'm not sure that would make things substantially better or better at all in fact . share improve this answer..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/993984/why-numpy-instead-of-python-lists

double precision ones 8 bytes. Less flexible but you pay substantially for the flexibility of standard Python lists share improve..