c++ Programming Glossary: perfectly
Why can't C++ be parsed with a LR(1) parser? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/243383/why-cant-c-be-parsed-with-a-lr1-parser with LR parsers Using google I only found that C can be perfectly parsed with LR 1 but C requires LR . c math logic parsing ..
how to use an iterator? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2712076/how-to-use-an-iterator the address of the result ii . Note that a pointer would perfectly fulfill all requirements for a std vector iterator and some..
C++ - passing references to boost::shared_ptr http://stackoverflow.com/questions/327573/c-passing-references-to-boostshared-ptr EDIT Just to clarify after reading several answers I perfectly agree on the premature optimization concerns and I alwasy try..
Which, if any, C++ compilers do tail-recursion optimization? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34125/which-if-any-c-compilers-do-tail-recursion-optimization recursion optimization It seems to me that it would work perfectly well to do tail recursion optimization in both C and C yet while..
push_back vs emplace_back http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4303513/push-back-vs-emplace-back a variadic list of arguments so that mean that you can now perfectly forward the argument and construct directly an object into a..
Undefined Behavior and Sequence Points Reloaded http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4638364/undefined-behavior-and-sequence-points-reloaded It looks like the code i.operator i.operator Works perfectly fine with regards to sequence points. Section 1.9.17 of the..
C++ Returning reference to local variable http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4643713/c-returning-reference-to-local-variable whatever you want with the returned value Note that it's perfectly fine to return big objects the same way func3 returns primitive.. Interestingly binding a temporary to a const reference is perfectly legal C . int main This works The returned temporary will last..
C++ - Forward declaration http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4757565/c-forward-declaration both try to use each other. When this happens and it is a perfectly valid thing to do you may #include one header file but that..
Why no default move-assignment/move-constructor? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4819936/why-no-default-move-assignment-move-constructor it utilizes the assignment operator meaning std move is perfectly safe. As I'm a simple programmer I'd like to take advantage..
Generating random integer from a range http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5008804/generating-random-integer-from-a-range I need it to be reasonably uniform use of rand is perfectly fine . the min max ranges can be anything from 0 1 to 32727..
Regular expression to detect semi-colon terminated C++ for & while loops http://stackoverflow.com/questions/524548/regular-expression-to-detect-semi-colon-terminated-c-for-while-loops # must end with a semi colon to match s s This works perfectly for all the above cases but it breaks as soon as you try and..
Operator Precedence vs Order of Evaluation http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5473107/operator-precedence-vs-order-of-evaluation evaluating this expression on a stack machine. It's perfectly allowable for it to do something like this push z Evaluates..
How to build Qt for Visual Studio 2010 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5601950/how-to-build-qt-for-visual-studio-2010 vs addin 1.1.9.exe from the Qt download page it will work perfectly. Appendix A Official Instructions There is a page at the official..
Is there any reason to check for a NULL pointer before deleting? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/615355/is-there-any-reason-to-check-for-a-null-pointer-before-deleting null pointers vc6 share improve this question It's perfectly safe to delete a null pointer it effectively amounts to a no..
Can a local variable's memory be accessed outside its scope? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441218/can-a-local-variables-memory-be-accessed-outside-its-scope so that you can come back for it later illegally it is perfectly legal for the compiler to generate code that turns back to zero..
Why should `new` be used as little as possible? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6500313/why-should-new-be-used-as-little-as-possible leads to memory leaks or memory fragmentation there are perfectly good use cases for dynamic allocation as it's less limited...
C/C++: Array size at run time w/o dynamic allocation is allowed? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/737240/c-c-array-size-at-run-time-w-o-dynamic-allocation-is-allowed if this is a mere brainfart or what but how can this be perfectly legal int main int argc char argv size_t size cin size int array..
What are the distinctions between the various symbols (*,&, etc) combined with parameters? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9636903/what-are-the-distinctions-between-the-various-symbols-etc-combined-with-p wonder how that could be So for clarification I understand perfectly how pointers work. What I am not grasping and am weirdly unable..
Take the address of a one-past-the-end array element via subscript: legal by the C++ Standard or not? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/988158/take-the-address-of-a-one-past-the-end-array-element-via-subscript-legal-by-the the end of array . array 4 1 dereferences array 4 which is perfectly safe takes the address of that lvalue and adds one to that address..
|