c++ Programming Glossary: pedantic

Is there a difference in C++ between copy initialization and direct initialization?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1051379/is-there-a-difference-in-c-between-copy-initialization-and-direct-initializati

compiler rejects it properly but GCC accepts it in non pedantic mode. Switching to pedantic makes it output the proper ambiguity.. but GCC accepts it in non pedantic mode. Switching to pedantic makes it output the proper ambiguity warning too though. I hope..

Conversion constructor vs. conversion operator: precedence

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1384007/conversion-constructor-vs-conversion-operator-precedence

to think that B has more business with it . Switch to pedantic mode pedantic to make it cause a diagnostic. Standardese 8.5.. that B has more business with it . Switch to pedantic mode pedantic to make it cause a diagnostic. Standardese 8.5 14 Otherwise..

Why does an overridden function in the derived class hide other overloads of the base class?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1628768/why-does-an-overridden-function-in-the-derived-class-hide-other-overloads-of-the

int n int main Derived obj obj.gogo 7 Got this error g pedantic Os test.cpp o test test.cpp In function `int main ' test.cpp..

Can main function call itself in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2128321/can-main-function-call-itself-in-c

the second clause. For this particular problem on gcc the pedantic option will warn about the illegality of calling main within..

Declaring the array size with a non-constant variable

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2863347/declaring-the-array-size-with-a-non-constant-variable

a GCC extension to the standard see here . You can use the pedantic option to cause GCC to issue a warning or std c 98 to make in..

Can I make GCC warn on passing too-wide types to functions?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/310108/can-i-make-gcc-warn-on-passing-too-wide-types-to-functions

g does even with all the warnings options I could think of pedantic Wall Wextra #include stdio.h short f short x return x int main..

Best compiler warning level for C/C++ compilers?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/399850/best-compiler-warning-level-for-c-c-compilers

extra paranoid flags I'm using for C code g O Wall Weffc pedantic pedantic errors Wextra Wall Waggregate return Wcast align Wcast.. flags I'm using for C code g O Wall Weffc pedantic pedantic errors Wextra Wall Waggregate return Wcast align Wcast qual..

C++: null reference

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4364536/c-null-reference

without any warning even when using Wall Wextra std c 98 pedantic Weffc ... Of course the reference is not actually null since..

Is main() really start of a C++ program?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4783404/is-main-really-start-of-a-c-program

here http www.ideone.com Niy0R I also compiled it with pedantic option GCC 4.5.0. It gives no error not even warning So my question..

Flags to enable thorough and verbose g++ warnings

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5088460/flags-to-enable-thorough-and-verbose-g-warnings

Wshadow Wwrite strings Wno unused parameter Wfloat equal pedantic ansi I will build at least my debug versions with this set of.. were excluded. This is my final set of suggested warnings pedantic Wall Wextra Wcast align Wcast qual Wctor dtor privacy Wdisabled..

Do the parentheses after the type name make a difference with new?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/620137/do-the-parentheses-after-the-type-name-make-a-difference-with-new

operator c faq share improve this question Let's get pedantic because there are differences that can actually affect your..

Why artificially limit your code to C? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/649789/why-artificially-limit-your-code-to-c

happens if you just swap gcc std c99 for g sandiego g g O1 pedantic mfpmath sse DUSE_SSE2 DUSE_XMM3 I src core L usr lib DARCH elf64..

C and C++ programming on Ubuntu 11.10 [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7937602/c-and-c-programming-on-ubuntu-11-10

compile with Wall Wextra and perhaps even with Werror pedantic errors Always correct your source code till you got no warning..

Why vector<bool>::reference doesn't return reference to bool?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8399417/why-vectorboolreference-doesnt-return-reference-to-bool

using g version 4.6.1 like this g O3 std c 0x Wall Wextra pedantic dk2.cpp The question is why this happens Is vector bool reference..

What is “rvalue reference for *this”?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8610571/what-is-rvalue-reference-for-this

test .f rvalue Output clang std c 0x stdlib libc Wall pedantic t.cpp . a.out lvalue object rvalue object The whole thing is..

What happens if I define a 0-size array in C/C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9722632/what-happens-if-i-define-a-0-size-array-in-c-c

is not allowed to implement it differently. gcc std c99 pedantic gives a warning for this although it must actually give an error...