¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: implementorsWhy can't you use offsetof on non-POD strucutures in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1129894/why-cant-you-use-offsetof-on-non-pod-strucutures-in-c C it would take a lot of freedom away from C compiler implementors how to organize class instance layout. The effect is that offsetof..
Template func and non template func call order http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12174493/template-func-and-non-template-func-call-order one set correct is difficult enough for most compiler implementors. And it's fairly well known that Microsoft's implementation..
Standard Library Containers with additional optional template parameters? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1469743/standard-library-containers-with-additional-optional-template-parameters is no ambiguity the standard is clear as written. Library implementors are not permitted to add template parameters to standard library.. permitted only if the standard gave explicit license for implementors to do this. This would require a change in the standard. The..
C++: std::string in a multi-threaded program http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1661154/c-stdstring-in-a-multi-threaded-program I could also wait for C 0x which I pray will require implementors to forgo COW. Or shudder I could use a custom string class...
Why should exceptions be used conservatively? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1744070/why-should-exceptions-be-used-conservatively question Expensive It is unlikely that the designers and implementors of a platform planned for quick execution of exception flows...
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19205531/why-does-this-specialized-char-traitsuint8-t-and-codecvtuint8-t-for-use-with 4.7.2 on AIX . The reason you got it is that gcc library implementors optimized basic_filebuf xsgetn which is called from basic_istream..
How are exceptions implemented under the hood? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1995734/how-are-exceptions-implemented-under-the-hood its own framework for exception handling which language implementors can use to build their own exceptions on top. A very interesting..
Why does valgrind say basic SDL program is leaking memory? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1997171/why-does-valgrind-say-basic-sdl-program-is-leaking-memory libraries. It's peculiar but I've assumed The library implementors know what they're doing probably preallocating some small static..
Is it possible to replace the global “operator new()” everywhere? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2104459/is-it-possible-to-replace-the-global-operator-new-everywhere linker has to make it work though exactly how is up to the implementors e.g. things like weak externals can be helpful for supplying..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/228908/is-listsize-really-on The nice thing about this is that it can be done by implementors today without a change to the standard unless I'm missing something..
Why was std::pow(double, int) removed from C++11? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5627030/why-was-stdpowdouble-int-removed-from-c11 ought to return the same answer. The experience from implementors of functions like pow is that by the time you go to the trouble.. 0x1.79ca10c92422bp 67 0x1.79ca10c924232p 67 And yes implementors of pow really do worry about all of those bits down at the low.. to shuffle pow double int off to a separate algorithm most implementors I'm aware of have given up on that strategy with the possible..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6484484/template-template-parameters were enough probably to make lives easier for the compiler implementors. That being said there's nothing stopping the committee from..
Please, describe you experience of using Microsoft C++/CLI [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/704388/please-describe-you-experience-of-using-microsoft-c-cli clients through the using statement but only C CLI helps implementors as well. I'm hopeful that perhaps one day C# will absorb this..
|