c++ Programming Glossary: implementers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14791984/appending-stdvector-to-itself-undefined-behavior

that it might work on some platforms if the library implementers are nice people but it could terribly and catastrophically fail..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/194634/string-c-str-vs-data

Use c_str if you want a null terminated string. If the implementers happend to implement data in terms of c_str you don't have to..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2118422/scope-of-c-libraries-in-c-x-h-vs-cx

This is D.5 depr.c.headers . This was ignored by lots of implementers some of which had very little control over the C Standard Library..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2398442/why-isnt-int-powint-base-int-exponent-in-the-standard-c-libraries

between implementer and programmer. And the number of implementers on the standards bodies far outweigh the number of programmers..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2587445/are-c-functions-declared-in-c-headers-guaranteed-to-be-in-the-global-names

This is D.5 depr.c.headers . This was ignored by lots of implementers some of which had very little control over the C Standard Library..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5416872/using-export-keyword-with-templates

Comeau and icc support this feature. The feedback from the implementers at EDG was extremely simple it took us time was extremely complicated..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6163040/strange-behavior-of-copy-initialization-doesnt-call-the-copy-constructor

implementation. I suspect that it could also inconvenience implementers to figure out whether the optimization will be successful before..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/704466/why-doesnt-delete-set-the-pointer-to-null

but that idea doesn't seem to have become popular with implementers. But the main issue he raises is that delete's argument need..