c# Programming Glossary: risky

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1068720/winforms-progress-bar-does-not-update-c

to inject Application.DoEvents into your code but this is risky and has problems with re entrancy etc and it is just a bit hacky...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1089662/python-inflate-and-deflate-implementations

the raw deflate stream without the Adler 32 checksum Bit risky unless replaced with something better. Updates error message..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1479711/asp-net-reading-and-writing-to-the-file-system-outside-the-application

I would urge you not to do this. You're getting into very risky areas as far as security is concerned. If you're not 100 sure..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18284998/pattern-for-calling-wcf-service-using-async-await

. But besides the fact that it's a lot of risky code he states that It 䏭 worth noting that it does have a few..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19010067/restful-login-proper-implementation

need to pass user id and password for every call. It is risky to store the password in the local storage. Hence use a POST..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2239472/trying-to-do-office-automation-with-excel-2007-but-keeps-using-excel-2003

might need to be changed so changing them by hand is a bit risky. In addition you should find the following keys as well HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/243351/environment-tickcount-vs-datetime-now

want to make any sense of the math it seems like it's too risky to be useful. I'm using DateTime.Now instead. Is this the best..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2929255/unable-to-launch-onscreen-keyboard-osk-exe-from-a-32-bit-process-on-win7-x64

You don't need it here. Clearly disabling redirection is a risky approach with side effects you cannot really predict. There..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3104856/using-contract-forall-in-code-contracts

subGroup . Option 1 doesn't really help. Option 2 is risky because it will circumvent the AddRequested Requires contract..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/358721/be-notified-when-all-background-threadpool-threads-are-finished

Decrementing a variable between threads is a little bit risky unless done with Interlocked.Decrement but that approach should..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/371109/garbage-collection-when-using-anonymous-delegates-for-event-handling

else unsubscribing the delegate from within itself is risky but because only one instance exists and nobody else has a reference..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/535436/linq-to-sql-recursively-get-children

I'm not sure I'd be hopeful... the list of searched ids is risky as a field I guess you're OK as long as you don't call it twice.....