¡@

Home 

java Programming Glossary: autobox

Java conditional operator ?: result type

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2615498/java-conditional-operator-result-type

operator type Float see explanation below therefore autobox arg2 therefore autobox arg3 E2 ` false 1.0f false 1.0f null.. see explanation below therefore autobox arg2 therefore autobox arg3 E2 ` false 1.0f false 1.0f null ` arg 2 '1.0f' type float.. operator type float see explanation below therefore un autobox arg3 Detailed Explanation Here's my understand from reading..

Android: Cannot invoke toString() on the primitive type int

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3028974/android-cannot-invoke-tostring-on-the-primitive-type-int

have any fields or methods. Sometimes the compiler will autobox your primitive into the corresponding class Integer in this.. will not do this. In this case it does not automatically autobox it. You have a few alternatives String.valueOf nltxt nltxt or.. write along with the number do nltxt equals nltxt Do the autoboxing manually new Integer nltxt .toString . Format it in some..

Arithmetic operations with Java Generics

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3873215/arithmetic-operations-with-java-generics

It would be nice though. Basically you are asking java to autobox a descedant of Number which happens to include Integer Float.. happens to include Integer Float and Double that could be autoboxed and have a plus operator applied however there could be any.. of other unknown descendants of Number that cannot be autoboxed and this cannot be known until runtime. Damn erasure share..

Java: Array of primitive data types does not autobox

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/517751/java-array-of-primitive-data-types-does-not-autobox

Array of primitive data types does not autobox I have a method like this public static T boolean isMemberOf.. This doesn't work. I would expect the char and char to get autoboxed to Character and Character but that doesn't seem to happen... that doesn't seem to happen. Any insights java generics autoboxing share improve this question There is no autoboxing for..

Conversion from null to int possible?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6588856/conversion-from-null-to-int-possible

as well have written y which would have saved you this autobox . Now the result has to be unboxed again to int because the..