c++ Programming Glossary: nothrow_t
“as if” in language standards http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2306587/as-if-in-language-standards purposes only. void operator new std size_t s const std nothrow_t nt return malloc s But let's say a program replaces operator..
overloading new and delete in c++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3509214/overloading-new-and-delete-in-c c 4.1.1 new 88 note void operator new size_t const std nothrow_t usr lib gcc i386 redhat linux 4.1.1 .. .. .. .. include c 4.1.1..
How do 'malloc' and 'new' work? How are they different (implementation wise)? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/365887/how-do-malloc-and-new-work-how-are-they-different-implementation-wise functions given special names no throw new. That takes a nothrow_t as second argument. A new expression of the form like the following.. call an allocation function taking only std size_t and nothrow_t Example new std nothrow TypeId placement new . That takes a..
Legality of using operator delete on a pointer obtained from placement new http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4418220/legality-of-using-operator-delete-on-a-pointer-obtained-from-placement-new operator new size_t or operator new size_t const std nothrow_t in the standard library and the value supplied to operator delete.. operator new size_t or operator new size_t const std nothrow_t in the standard library. Your delete call will call the libraries'..
Can I 'delete[]' a pointer that points into an allocated array, but not to the start of it? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6420329/can-i-delete-a-pointer-that-points-into-an-allocated-array-but-not-to-the-s
|