c++ Programming Glossary: foo1

Coding Practices which enable the compiler/optimizer to make a faster program

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2074099/coding-practices-which-enable-the-compiler-optimizer-to-make-a-faster-program

example if your code looks like void DoSomething const Foo foo1 const Foo foo2 int numFoo Foo barOut for int i 0 i numFoo i.. int numFoo Foo barOut for int i 0 i numFoo i barOut.munge foo1 foo2 i the compiler doesn't know that foo1 barOut and thus.. barOut.munge foo1 foo2 i the compiler doesn't know that foo1 barOut and thus has to reload foo1 each time through the loop...

How do I find where an exception was thrown in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2443135/how-do-i-find-where-an-exception-was-thrown-in-c

ERROR return 0 int foo2 throw_exception return 0 int foo1 foo2 return 0 int main int argc char argv struct sigaction sigact.. for signal SIGABRT strsignal SIGABRT n exit EXIT_FAILURE foo1 exit EXIT_SUCCESS Output my_terminate caught unhanded exception... 0x8049008 bt 5 . test foo2__Fv 0xb 0x8049043 bt 6 . test foo1__Fv 0xb 0x8049057 bt 7 . test main 0xc1 0x8049121 bt 8 . test..

When pass-by-pointer is preferred to pass-by-reference in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2550377/when-pass-by-pointer-is-preferred-to-pass-by-reference-in-c

take the following functions int foo int x int foo1 int x int foo2 int x Now in the code I do the following int.. following int testInt 0 foo testInt can't modify testInt foo1 testInt can modify testInt foo2 testInt can modify testInt In.. testInt foo2 testInt can modify testInt In calling foo vs foo1 it's not apparent from the callers perspective or a programmer..

C++: const reference, before vs after type-specifier

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3694630/c-const-reference-before-vs-after-type-specifier

What is the difference between the arguments in int foo1 const Fred arg ... and int foo2 Fred const arg ... I don't see..

How to write an automated test for thread safety

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/394900/how-to-write-an-automated-test-for-thread-safety

class code which is not thread safe Moreover if you have foo1 and foo2 objects you cannot call foo1 someFunc until foo2 anotherFunc.. Moreover if you have foo1 and foo2 objects you cannot call foo1 someFunc until foo2 anotherFunc has returned this can happen..

Function with same name but different signature in derived class

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/411103/function-with-same-name-but-different-signature-in-derived-class

I remove int foo int i from class B or if I rename it to foo1 everything works fine. What's the problem with this Thank you...

Using boost::bind with boost::function: retrieve binded variable type

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7893768/using-boostbind-with-boostfunction-retrieve-binded-variable-type

call_info _myVec int _myInt double _myDouble public void foo1 int i void foo2 double d void bar void execute char param void.. void MyClass bar call_info info info.func std bind MyClass foo1 this MyClass _myInt info.arg_type int _myVector.push_back info..

error: request for member … in … which is of non-class type

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/877523/error-request-for-member-in-which-is-of-non-class-type

public Foo Foo int a void bar int main this works... Foo foo1 1 foo1.bar this does not... Foo foo2 foo2.bar return 0 ... I.. Foo Foo int a void bar int main this works... Foo foo1 1 foo1.bar this does not... Foo foo2 foo2.bar return 0 ... I get the..