¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: formally

Is there any way to pass an anonymous array as an argument in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1140630/is-there-any-way-to-pass-an-anonymous-array-as-an-argument-in-c

actually an initializer list . Initializer lists will be formally recognized as objects in C 0x. For now they are just a syntax..

Is is_constexpr possible in C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13299394/is-is-constexpr-possible-in-c11

Does initialization entail lvalue-to-rvalue conversion? Is `int x = x;` UB?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14935722/does-initialization-entail-lvalue-to-rvalue-conversion-is-int-x-x-ub

of this Q A it has emerged that the C 11 Standard fails to formally specify what value categories are expected by each language..

Virtual Table C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2173493/virtual-table-c

for Derived . If Derived didn't override anything at all formally it still would be a separate polymorphic class but in order..

pass fortran 77 function to C/C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2902186/pass-fortran-77-function-to-c-c

can follow the calling conventions of C such as C . While formally a part of Fortran 2003 and while there are extremely few Fortran..

difference between c's expression and c++'s expression

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3572753/difference-between-cs-expression-and-cs-expression

the result is an rvalue . Note that rvalue is only used formally in C . In C the results of expressions are either explicitly..

Friend access to protected nested class

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3584385/friend-access-to-protected-nested-class

it imposes high costs on the implementation and it's formally undecidable in the presence of templates. share improve this..

Structure of a C++ Object in Memory Vs a Struct

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/422830/structure-of-a-c-object-in-memory-vs-a-struct

your class has both a constructor and a destructor it is formally speaking not of POD type so the guarantee does not hold. Although..

The relationship between auto and decltype

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6869888/the-relationship-between-auto-and-decltype

sizeof operator the operand of decltype is unevaluated. Informally the type returned by decltype e is deduced as follows If the.. or function exactly as declared in the source code. More formally Rule 1 applies to unparenthesized id expressions and class member..

Why do I see strange values when I print uninitialized variables?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4259885/why-do-i-see-strange-values-when-i-print-uninitialized-variables

program is no longer guaranteed to do anything you say. Formally reading a value means performing an lvalue to rvalue conversion..

Is there a C++ equivalent to Java's BigDecimal?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4798777/is-there-a-c-equivalent-to-javas-bigdecimal

that GCC will eventually support this functionality. Formally known as ISO IEC TR 24733 I'm looking for something I can use..

Type of 'this' pointer

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6067244/type-of-this-pointer

must be an internal quirk of the specific compiler. Formally it is incorrect. Here are the relevant quotes from the language..

Accessing class members on a NULL pointer

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/669742/accessing-class-members-on-a-null-pointer

a null pointer because you never dereference one. Formally calling any function even a non virtual one on a null pointer..

What comes first - stack unwinding or copying of return values

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8923018/what-comes-first-stack-unwinding-or-copying-of-return-values

with boost lib. c share improve this question Yes . Formally there are two &ldquo copies&rdquo when returning a value one..

recompile after base class change

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9188101/recompile-after-base-class-change

c compilation recompile share improve this question Formally if you don't recompile you're violating the One Definition Rule..