c++ Programming Glossary: foo.end
Rotating a string using C++ [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11668221/rotating-a-string-using-c
Any reason to replace while(condition) with for(;condition;) in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1379246/any-reason-to-replace-whilecondition-with-forcondition-in-c of namespaces container iterator iter foo.begin for iter foo.end iter do stuff But that's as far as I'll go with leaving things.. That could lead to code that looks like this for iter foo.end do stuff if condition iter foo.erase iter else iter However..
Use a regular iterator to iterate backwards, or struggle with reverse_iterator? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1853358/use-a-regular-iterator-to-iterate-backwards-or-struggle-with-reverse-iterator is a test with two letter a's involved. std find foo.begin foo.end L'a' Returns an iterator pointing to the first a character... 1 Returns an iterator pointing to the last A. std find foo.end foo.begin L'a' WRONG Buffer overrun Use whichever iterator results..
fix (lock) size of std::vector http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6623387/fix-lock-size-of-stdvector make a copy any vector const std vector int frob foo.begin foo.end Alternatively if you need reset semantics but want to forbid..
Why is “!=” used with iterators? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6673762/why-is-used-with-iterators which it points. So if you end up in a scenario where it foo.end does not do the same thing as it foo.end you already have undefined.. scenario where it foo.end does not do the same thing as it foo.end you already have undefined behavior because you've iterated..
|