c++ Programming Glossary: facto
Accessing inactive union member - undefined? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11373203/accessing-inactive-union-member-undefined is complete. So for a primitive type which ipso facto has trivial initialization contained in a union the lifetime..
WINMAIN and main() in C++ (Extended) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13871617/winmain-and-main-in-c-extended in nix because C and C originated with nix. However the de facto Windows standard for the encoding of the main arguments is Windows..
std::function vs template http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14677997/stdfunction-vs-template Can I thus assume that function s can be used as de facto standard of passing functors and in places where high performance..
Thread safety of std::map for read-only operations http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1846186/thread-safety-of-stdmap-for-read-only-operations your map remains the same. The map you use is immutable de facto so any find will actually do a find in a map which does not..
Boost.ASIO-based HTTP client library (like libcurl) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2251361/boost-asio-based-http-client-library-like-libcurl Solutions based on Boost.ASIO which has become the de facto C TCP library are preferred. c http curl boost asio share..
Program portability http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3525177/program-portability hardly anyone uses a conforming C compiler so there's a de facto common subset of C that you'll want to stick to. 5. Understand..
Is there a standard C++ function object for taking apart a std::pair? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/372695/is-there-a-standard-c-function-object-for-taking-apart-a-stdpair taking apart a std pair Does anyone know if there's a de facto standard i.e. TR1 or Boost C function object for accessing the..
Data alignment in C++, standard and portability http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7054176/data-alignment-in-c-standard-and-portability buf 1 However this is done so commonly that it is a de facto standard. The standards folks last time I checked were working..
New (std::nothrow) vs. New within a try/catch block http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7277637/new-stdnothrow-vs-new-within-a-try-catch-block maintainability and performance while disregarding de facto c programming convention. c performance exception handling..
#ifdef for 32-bit platform http://stackoverflow.com/questions/735647/ifdef-for-32-bit-platform unix flavors mostly using GCC for compilation. Any de facto standards I can use cross platform EDIT 2 I've found some definitions..
In C++ is “const” after type ID acceptable? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/988069/in-c-is-const-after-type-id-acceptable one and stick with it. But if your team already has a de facto standard don't change it That said I think by far the more common..
|