c# Programming Glossary: compiler's

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1120688/event-and-delegate-contravariance-in-net-4-0-and-c-sharp-4-0

is added. I guess this is a bug in the CLR in beta 1 the compiler's behaviour looks hopefully right . Update for Release Candidate..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14621564/why-cant-a-list-of-an-interface-type-accept-intances-of-an-inheriting-interface

ISecondary is not assignable from List IPrimary is the compiler's way of getting you out of such troubles. share improve this..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/292820/how-to-correctly-unregister-an-event-handler

events delegates share improve this question The C# compiler's default implementation of adding an event handler calls Delegate.Combine..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3082310/why-are-private-virtual-methods-illegal-in-c

getting the semantics right is your business not the compiler's and you have to enforce that with appropriate code reviews...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4096249/how-to-change-the-language-of-microsoft-c-sharp-compilers-error-messages

to change the language of Microsoft C# compiler's error messages Their Russian translation is invalid and confusing...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4096299/why-doesnt-delegate-contravariance-work-with-value-types

arg return arg null I'd like to provide you with the compiler's error message but I have it in my local language and don't know..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4499528/compile-time-and-runtime-casting-c-sharp

hierarchy some another affinity between objects or it is compiler's internal business c# .net casting type systems share improve..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5204667/c-sharp-compiler-optimization-unused-methods

inside a class EDIT Are there a set of rules about the compiler's optmization that are documented anywhere c# visual studio 2008..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5438307/detailed-explanation-of-variable-capture-in-closures

Console.WriteLine counter counter Now here's what the compiler's doing for you except that it would use unspeakable names which..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5678216/all-possible-c-sharp-array-initialization-syntaxes

initialization syntax alone is not enough to satisfy the compiler's demands. So if you're into the whole brevity thing the above..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6802573/c-sharp-interfaces-whats-the-point

instance during runtime will have that method. From the compiler's point of view it's invalid since he cannot verify it. You can..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8606390/why-arent-generic-type-constraints-inheritable-hierarchically-enforced

that you've satisfied the constraint. It's not the compiler's job to figure out what you meant to say and work out what further..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8795550/casting-a-result-to-float-in-method-returning-float-changes-result

may have different results depending upon details of the compiler's runtime state. More generally your expectation that floating..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8909811/c-sharp-optional-parameters-on-overridden-methods

detail if I didn't also use the AAA interface nearby . The compiler's behaviour matches my intuition which is why when first reading..