c++ Programming Glossary: sight
Why is the C++ STL is so heavily based on templates? (and not on *interfaces*) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1039853/why-is-the-c-stl-is-so-heavily-based-on-templates-and-not-on-interfaces quite clever as well. OOP on its own just isn't a pretty sight. Try drawing a dependency graph of a hypothetical OOP ified..
why does pthread_exit throw something caught by ellipsis? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11452546/why-does-pthread-exit-throw-something-caught-by-ellipsis that crashes due to an unhandled exception is not a pretty sight but it can provide a debugable crash dump that clearly shows..
Why there is no std::copy_if algorithm? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1448817/why-there-is-no-stdcopy-if-algorithm The C Programming Language it was just an over sight. as a citation the same question answered in boost mail lists..
linked list and reading from text file http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14993882/linked-list-and-reading-from-text-file the rule that one should name just about everything in sight I moved part of that inside the loop then with a break statement...
What exactly is a reentrant function? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2799023/what-exactly-is-a-reentrant-function myFunction MyCallback f lock mutex f unlock mutex At first sight this function seems Ok... But wait int main int argc char argv..
Initializing an object to all zeroes http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2837854/initializing-an-object-to-all-zeroes code even though it might not look too pretty at the first sight. Of course in C there's no need to introduce a block. As for..
Different behavior of compilers with array allocation http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3093049/different-behavior-of-compilers-with-array-allocation in a large project and it did not make much sense at first sight . c optimization compiler compile time constant share improve..
How much is too much with C++0x auto keyword http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6434971/how-much-is-too-much-with-c0x-auto-keyword whenever it's hard to say how to write the type at first sight but the type of the right hand side of an expression is obvious...
Does C++11 change the behavior of explicitly calling std::swap to ensure ADL-located swap's are found, like boost::swap? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9170247/does-c11-change-the-behavior-of-explicitly-calling-stdswap-to-ensure-adl-loc It's uglier but it works and is understandable in hind sight. boost swap wraps this up nicely for us and provides array overloads..
What are the common causes for high CPU usage? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9275262/what-are-the-common-causes-for-high-cpu-usage you have at least 16 cores then your result is at first sight anomalous and if you had 16 cores then one thread occupying..
|