¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: legalWhat is the difference between a definition and a declaration? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1410563/what-is-the-difference-between-a-definition-and-a-declaration be declared as often as you want. Thus the following is legal in C and C double f int double double f int double extern double..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1613230/uses-of-c-comma-operator operator You see it used in for loop statements but it's legal syntax anywhere. What uses have you found for it elsewhere if..
Why isn't it legal to convert “pointer to pointer to non-const” to a “pointer to pointer to const” http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2220916/why-isnt-it-legal-to-convert-pointer-to-pointer-to-non-const-to-a-pointer-to isn't it legal to convert &ldquo pointer to pointer to non const&rdquo to a.. to a &ldquo pointer to pointer to const&rdquo It is legal to convert a pointer to non const to a pointer to const. Then.. to non const to a pointer to const. Then why isn't it legal to convert a pointer to pointer to non const to a pointer to..
Undefined Behavior and Sequence Points http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4176328/undefined-behavior-and-sequence-points written. So it is fine. This rule effectively constrains legal expressions to those in which the accesses demonstrably precede..
Superiority of unnamed namespace over static? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4422507/superiority-of-unnamed-namespace-over-static the user defined types . The following code is valid in C legal code static int sample_function function body static int sample_variale.. static int sample_variale But this code is NOT valid illegal code static class sample_class class body static struct sample_struct.. body So the solution is unnamed namespace which is this legal code namespace class sample_class class body struct sample_struct..
What does T&& (double ampersand) mean in C++11? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5481539/what-does-t-double-ampersand-mean-in-c11 without having to be const. Thus this syntax is now legal T r T rvalue references primarily provide for the following..
smart pointers (boost) explained http://stackoverflow.com/questions/569775/smart-pointers-boost-explained unique_ptr type p new type unique_ptr type q p not legal unique_ptr type r move p legal. p is now empty but r owns the.. unique_ptr type q p not legal unique_ptr type r move p legal. p is now empty but r owns the object unique_ptr type s function_returning_a_unique_ptr.. object unique_ptr type s function_returning_a_unique_ptr legal This is the semantic that std auto_ptr obeys but because of..
What are the differences between pointer variable and reference variable in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/57483/what-are-the-differences-between-pointer-variable-and-reference-variable-in-c cannot not without some indirection const int x int 12 legal C int y int 12 illegal to dereference a temporary. This makes.. some indirection const int x int 12 legal C int y int 12 illegal to dereference a temporary. This makes const safer for use in..
Can a local variable's memory be accessed outside its scope? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6441218/can-a-local-variables-memory-be-accessed-outside-its-scope you leave stuff behind they'll shred it for you. If you illegally re enter your room with a stolen key to get it back the hotel.. when you checked out of the hotel and stole a key to illegally use later you gave up the right to live in a predictable safe.. the rules of the system. If you try to do something illegal and foolish like going back into a room you're not authorized..
“unpacking” a tuple to call a matching function pointer http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7858817/unpacking-a-tuple-to-call-a-matching-function-pointer so I'd rather write something like func params... Not legal int main int a 666 double b 1.234 void c NULL save_it_for_later..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/988158/take-the-address-of-a-one-past-the-end-array-element-via-subscript-legal-by-the address of a one past the end array element via subscript legal by the C Standard or not I have seen it asserted several times.. 5 int array_begin array 0 int array_end array 5 Is array 5 legal C code in this context I would like an answer with a reference.. standards share improve this question Your example is legal but only because you're not actually using an out of bounds..
|