¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: destructing

performance of C++0x exceptions

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1018800/performance-of-c0x-exceptions

overhead of 1.5us per level of stack where each level is destructing one object . Obviously C 0x doesn't specify performance for..

How C++ destructor works [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11712471/how-c-destructor-works

of a scalar object is always a no op. Specifically destructing a pointer variable does not destroy the pointee. Scoped objects.. Note that the destructor body is not responsible for destructing the data members themselves. You only need to write a destructor..

overloading operator delete, or how to kill a cat?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1939556/overloading-operator-delete-or-how-to-kill-a-cat

need to change the bahaviour of the destructor to stop destructing . This is not possible also for very good reasons. So if you..

C++ difference between reference, objects and pointers

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3224155/c-difference-between-reference-objects-and-pointers

is equivalent to accessing the object itself however when destructing a reference we do not destruct the object itself. A reference..

Why does C++ not have reflection?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/359237/why-does-c-not-have-reflection

are only performant if the overhead of instantiating and destructing the object can be optimized away. operator on a vector is only..

Pointers, smart pointers or shared pointers?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/417481/pointers-smart-pointers-or-shared-pointers

if used everywhere. The reason being that creating copying destructing a shared pointer needs to be an atomic operation and this can..

Object destruction in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6403055/object-destruction-in-c

of a scalar object is always a no op. Specifically destructing a pointer variable does not destroy the pointee. Scoped objects.. Note that the destructor body is not responsible for destructing the data members themselves. You only need to write a destructor..

Why do some people use swap for move assignments?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6687388/why-do-some-people-use-swap-for-move-assignments

remember who pointed out to me that the side effects of destructing the lhs prior to the assignment might be important such as the..

Do I need to explicitly call the base virtual destructor?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/677620/do-i-need-to-explicitly-call-the-base-virtual-destructor

to base destructor... this MyBaseClass ~MyBaseClass Some destructing specific to MyChildClass Am I right c destructor share improve..

What's the best technique for exiting from a constructor on an error condition in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/737653/whats-the-best-technique-for-exiting-from-a-constructor-on-an-error-condition-i

destructor is not called. So you need to be careful about destructing objects that you already constructed before the exception is..

Order of calling constructors/destructors in inheritance

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7539282/order-of-calling-constructors-destructors-in-inheritance

first calls its parent constructor and vice versa when destructing. What about fields A a in this case When B is created when will.. And if there's no default list And the same question about destructing. c constructor order of execution call hierarchy share improve..