¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: declWhy class { int i; }; is not fully standard-conformant? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13138605/why-class-int-i-is-not-fully-standard-conformant valid it breaks the rule that such a class must declare at least one name into its enclosing scope. I couldn't really.. int i note the lack of a final semicolon because this decl specifier seq for an unnamed class might be used in some other.. in some other construct such as a typedef or a variable declaration. The problem with class public int i note that the final..
Sizeof array passed as parameter http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1328223/sizeof-array-passed-as-parameter The type of each parameter is determined from its own decl specifier seq and declarator. After determining the type of.. is determined from its own decl specifier seq and declarator. After determining the type of each parameter any parameter..
What are declarations and declarators and how are their types interpreted by the standard? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13808932/what-are-declarations-and-declarators-and-how-are-their-types-interpreted-by-the are declarations and declarators and how are their types interpreted.. are declarations and declarators and how are their types interpreted by the standard .. does the standard define that for example float e 10 5 declares a variable of type reference to array of 10 pointer to function..
Grammar of a C++ Translation Unit http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4335024/grammar-of-a-c-translation-unit unit after the preprocessor has run is a sequence of declarations let me remind that any definition is also a declaration.. declarations let me remind that any definition is also a declaration . Many people have argued with this statement but no.. But I myself found this example which troubles me int x declaration EMPTY DECLARATION int main dec la ration This compiles..
Is the typedef-name optional in a typedef declaration? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6399898/is-the-typedef-name-optional-in-a-typedef-declaration the typedef name optional in a typedef declaration I was quite surprised when I saw the following code.. typedef requires a name similarly Comeau warns warning declaration requires a typedef name and g 4.6 informs warning 'typedef'.. and g 4.6 informs warning 'typedef' was ignored in this declaration . I have not been able to identify where in the standard..
Hoisting the dynamic type out of a loop (a.k.a. doing Java the C++ way) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7451442/hoisting-the-dynamic-type-out-of-a-loop-a-k-a-doing-java-the-c-way 78 pushq rbp 79 LCFI10 80 movq rsp rbp 81 LCFI11 82 decl edi 83 je L18 84 L17 85 leave 86 ret 87 .align 4 88 L18 89 cmpl..
|