¡@

Home 

c# Programming Glossary: oo

Implementing a scripting language in C#

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1394180/implementing-a-scripting-language-in-c-sharp

the 3rd party developer use conditionals loops maybe OO etc.. Thanks in advance c# .net wpf scripting share improve..

How to decide between MonoTouch and Objective-C?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1583856/how-to-decide-between-monotouch-and-objective-c

because Objective C is C. It's a nice fancy friendly OO version but if pointers give you the heebie jeebies MonoTouch..

What are first-class objects in Java and C#?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1599176/what-are-first-class-objects-in-java-and-c

are first class objects in Java and C# When I started OO programming many years ago I gained the impression that variables..

What ORM for .net should I use?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1691575/what-orm-for-net-should-i-use

get set autogens FK public virtual User get set autogens OO mapping to User table which takes all POCO entities and automatically.. complex multi database multi db server or hard to map to OO legacy situations. For me NH shines because it doesn't limit..

Should C# have multiple inheritance? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/191691/should-c-sharp-have-multiple-inheritance

deny it's utility over interfaces composition and similar OO techniques. Is the exclusion of multiple inheritance saying..

Why does C# not provide the C++ style 'friend' keyword?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/203616/why-does-c-sharp-not-provide-the-c-style-friend-keyword

classes and undermines some fundamental attributes of an OO language. That being said it is a nice feature and I've used.. like to use it in C# too. But I bet because of C#'s pure OOness compared to C 's pseudo OOness MS decided that because Java.. I bet because of C#'s pure OOness compared to C 's pseudo OOness MS decided that because Java has no friend keyword C# shouldn't..

Getters and Setters are bad OO design?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2747721/getters-and-setters-are-bad-oo-design

and Setters are bad OO design Getters and Setters are bad Briefly reading over the.. the above article I find that getters and setters are bad OO design and should be avoided as they go against Encapsulation.. question Getters or setters by themselves are not bad OO design. What is bad is coding practice which includes a getter..

Why are private virtual methods illegal in C#?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3082310/why-are-private-virtual-methods-illegal-in-c

susceptible to the brittle base class problem than other OO languages. If an inaccessible virtual method could be overridden..

Is it possible to have a private class?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3235283/is-it-possible-to-have-a-private-class

inside of a class the outer one but need a more structured OO design of code to implement it. I have used this pattern in..

Overriding vs method hiding [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3838553/overriding-vs-method-hiding

writes xyz Overriding is the classic OO way in which a derived class can have more specific behaviour..

Entity Framework/SQL2008 - How to Automatically Update LastModified fields for Entities?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3879011/entity-framework-sql2008-how-to-automatically-update-lastmodified-fields-for-e

with generics . I would need to do some sort of OO trickery like make my POCO's implement an interface and call..

add values to enum

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/55375/add-values-to-enum

the sense of adding new values to an enum but also in the OO sense of inheriting from an existing enum. I assume it's not..

Why are public fields faster than properties?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/632831/why-are-public-fields-faster-than-properties

auto implemented property public int Foo get set 'better' OO design than a public field Or better said how are those two..

Difference between Property and Field in C# 3.0+

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/653536/difference-between-property-and-field-in-c-sharp-3-0

here the other reason is that it's simply not good OO design. And if you don't have a very good reason for doing it..

What is better? Static methods OR Instance methods

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/874363/what-is-better-static-methods-or-instance-methods

Jay... c# share improve this question In a perfect OO world there probably wouldn't be any need for static methods.. either . But at the end of the day what matters is not OO pureness of your code C# has enough concepts that aren't strictly.. your code C# has enough concepts that aren't strictly pure OO like extension methods for example but rather what you're getting..