¡@

Home 

c# Programming Glossary: concurrentbag

Multithreading improvements in .NET 4

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2704583/multithreading-improvements-in-net-4

backing storage classes ConcurrentQueue ConcurentStack ConcurrentBag which are all thread safe and are different in terms of element..

Thread safe collections in .NET

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2980283/thread-safe-collections-in-net

collections in the System.Collections.Concurrent Namespace ConcurrentBag T Represents a thread safe unordered collection of objects...

Why is ConcurrentBag<T> so slow in .Net (4.0)? Am I doing it wrong?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4785622/why-is-concurrentbagt-so-slow-in-net-4-0-am-i-doing-it-wrong

is ConcurrentBag T so slow in .Net 4.0 Am I doing it wrong Before I started.. I wrote a simple test to compare the performance of ConcurrentBag from System.Collections.Concurrent relative to locking lists... relative to locking lists. I am extremely surprised that ConcurrentBag is over 10 times slower than locking with a simple List. From..

Thread-safe List<T> property

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5874317/thread-safe-listt-property

in System.Collections.Concurrent Namespace You could use ConcurrentBag T in this case instead of List T share improve this answer..

No ConcurrentList<T> in .Net 4.0?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6601611/no-concurrentlistt-in-net-4-0

seen ConcurrentDictionary ConcurrentQueue ConcurrentStack ConcurrentBag and BlockingCollection . One thing that seems to be mysteriously..

Why does this Parallel.ForEach code freeze the program up?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8365346/why-does-this-parallel-foreach-code-freeze-the-program-up

time so there are race conditions there. Either substitute ConcurrentBag for List or wrap the lists inside a lock statement each time..