¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: some_funcThrow keyword in function's signature (C++) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1055387/throw-keyword-in-functions-signature-c to signify this in the function's signature. I.e. bool some_func throw myExc ... if shit_happens throw myExc shit happens .....
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1388685/local-variable-scope-question with explicit scope boost scoped_lock lock my_mutex int x some_func should be protected in multi threaded program mutex released.. the following one string int x boost scoped_lock my_mutex some_func still multi thread safe mutex released here c variable scope..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1484641/c-override-overload-problem a problem in C #include iostream class A protected void some_func const unsigned int param1 std cout A some_func param1 std endl.. void some_func const unsigned int param1 std cout A some_func param1 std endl public virtual ~A virtual void some_func const.. A some_func param1 std endl public virtual ~A virtual void some_func const unsigned int param1 const char some_func param1 class..
does not name a type error in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2133250/does-not-name-a-type-error-in-c defined foo fp likewise we can form a reference to it void some_func foo fr but this would be an error as before because it requires.. okay now define foo int fooInt double fooDouble void bar some_func foo fr now that foo is defined we can read that reference fr.fooInt..
correct idiom for std::string constants? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2312860/correct-idiom-for-stdstring-constants s abc assert s 123 overload operators for char some_func s implicit conversion some_func StaticString abc temporary object.. operators for char some_func s implicit conversion some_func StaticString abc temporary object initialized from literal Note..
Are goto and destructors compatible? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/334780/are-goto-and-destructors-compatible compatible This code leads to undefined behavior void some_func goto undefined T x T undefined The constructor is not called... x be called I think it will be but I want to be sure. void some_func T x T goto out out c share improve this question Yes destructors..
Class method as winAPI callback http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3725425/class-method-as-winapi-callback ahead typedef void callback int blah void user_data void some_func callback cb void user_data class my_class public ... void call_some_func.. cb void user_data class my_class public ... void call_some_func some_func callback_ this private void callback int blah std.. user_data class my_class public ... void call_some_func some_func callback_ this private void callback int blah std cout blah..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/389827/namespaces-in-c something along these lines #define NAMESPACE name_of_ns some_function some_other_function This would get translated to name_of_ns_some_function.. This would get translated to name_of_ns_some_function name_of_ns_some_other_function c c namespaces preprocessor.. #ifndef FOOBAR_H_ #define FOOBAR_H_ long names void foobar_some_func int void foobar_other_func short names #ifdef FOOBAR_SHORT_NAMES..
How to write an automated test for thread safety http://stackoverflow.com/questions/394900/how-to-write-an-automated-test-for-thread-safety you can assert that another_func 's start time is after some_func 's start time and it's completed time is before some_func s.. some_func 's start time and it's completed time is before some_func s completed time. Since your fake class is only recording the..
scope resolution operator without a scope http://stackoverflow.com/questions/75213/scope-resolution-operator-without-a-scope compile void bar this is a global function class foo void some_func bar this function is calling the global bar and not the class..
|