¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: should'veerror: cannot bind ?˜std::basic_ostream<char>??lvalue to ?˜std::basic_ostream<char>&&??/a> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13347530/error-cannot-bind-stdbasic-ostreamchar-lvalue-to-stdbasic-ostreamchar
correct idiom for std::string constants? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2312860/correct-idiom-for-stdstring-constants In fact I feel this class is close to what string literals should've been in C if it weren't for the C compatibility requirement...
Are IEEE floats valid key types for std::map and std::set? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4816156/are-ieee-floats-valid-key-types-for-stdmap-and-stdset a different question regarding that soon. Update Sigh . I should've posed the question without specifying float I just thought it..
Constructor called on an already created object http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038950/constructor-called-on-an-already-created-object must have the exact same name as the class itself. So f should've been F . Yes case sensitivity matters in C I'll assume this..
std::transform() and toupper(), no matching function http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7131858/stdtransform-and-toupper-no-matching-function std cout hello in upper case out std endl Theoretically it should've worked as it's one of the examples in Josuttis' book but it..
Is there a range class in C++11 for use with range based for loops? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7185437/is-there-a-range-class-in-c11-for-use-with-range-based-for-loops and useful. But it seems to me like something like this should've been made part of the standard. So is it Was some sort of new..
|