¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: pm

How to compare two time stamp in format “Month Date hh:mm:ss” to check +ve or -ve value

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15555406/how-to-compare-two-time-stamp-in-format-month-date-hhmmss-to-check-ve-or-v

or an abbreviation d Day of the month 1 1 . r Time in AM PM format of the locale. If not available in the locale time format.. in the locale time format defaults to the POSIX time AM PM format I M S p. time_t mktime struct tm timeptr function to..

Microsecond resolution timestamps on Windows

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2414359/microsecond-resolution-timestamps-on-windows

on Windows Vista and later if it is available or the ACPI PM timer . On my system Windows 7 x64 dual core AMD the timer runs.. By default Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 SP2 uses the PM timer for all multiprocessor APIC or ACPI HALs unless the check.. to find a common PC with zero ACPI support and no usable PM timer. The most common case is probably BIOS settings when ACPI..

How to link to dynamic boost libs?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2520234/how-to-link-to-dynamic-boost-libs

got these. Shared dynamic link libraries 24 03 2010 11 25 PM 53 248 boost_thread vc80 mt 1_42.dll 24 03 2010 11 25 PM 17.. PM 53 248 boost_thread vc80 mt 1_42.dll 24 03 2010 11 25 PM 17 054 boost_thread vc80 mt 1_42.lib 24 03 2010 11 25 PM 17.. PM 17 054 boost_thread vc80 mt 1_42.lib 24 03 2010 11 25 PM 17 054 boost_thread vc80 mt.lib 24 03 2010 11 25 PM 73 728 boost_thread..

Why does INVOKE facility in the C++11 standard refer to data members?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12638393/why-does-invoke-facility-in-the-c11-standard-refer-to-data-members

func.memfn template class R class T unspecified mem_fn R T pm p1 Returns A simple call wrapper 20.8.1 fn such that the expression.. that the expression fn t a2 ... aN is equivalent to INVOKE pm t a2 ... aN 20.8.2 . fn shall have a nested type result_type.. type result_type that is a synonym for the return type of pm when pm is a pointer to member function . I don't think that..

Why not infer template parameter from constructor?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/984394/why-not-infer-template-parameter-from-constructor

are using your class like this MyClass m string s MyClass pm pm m I am not sure if it would be so obvious for the parser.. using your class like this MyClass m string s MyClass pm pm m I am not sure if it would be so obvious for the parser to.. for the parser to know what template type is the MyClass pm Not sure if what I said make sense but feel free to add some..