¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: modifiablehttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/105014/does-the-mutable-keyword-have-any-purpose-other-than-allowing-the-variable-to on a lambda to denote that things captured by value are modifiable they aren't by default int x 0 auto f1 mutable x 42 OK auto..
Passing a modifiable parameter to c++ function http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1322517/passing-a-modifiable-parameter-to-c-function a modifiable parameter to c function Provided I want to pass a modifiable.. parameter to c function Provided I want to pass a modifiable parameter to a function what should I choose to pass it by pointer..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13230480/what-does-auto-tell-us vector but we wanted a reference auto will only bind to modifiable lvalues const auto will bind to anything but make it const giving.. use_it_elsewhere T so that the latter will be called for modifiable rvalues and it can rip its guts out for the sake of performance..
What is the value category of the operands of C++ operators when unspecified? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14991219/what-is-the-value-category-of-the-operands-of-c-operators-when-unspecified operators all group right to left. All require a modifiable lvalue as their left operand and return an lvalue referring..
How come a non-const reference cannot bind to a temporary object? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1565600/how-come-a-non-const-reference-cannot-bind-to-a-temporary-object but directly calling a non const member function on a modifiable rvalue is explicit so it's allowed ... Basically you shouldn't..
Do pointers to string literals remain valid after a function returns? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1588976/do-pointers-to-string-literals-remain-valid-after-a-function-returns reason to treat string literals as pointers to potentially modifiable memory are probably rare. Dynamically allocated the word 'heap'..
Pointer expressions: *ptr++, *++ptr and ++*ptr http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18481740/pointer-expressions-ptr-ptr-and-ptr Because in this instance p is an array. An array is not a modifiable l value you can't change where p points by pre or post increment..
C++0x rvalue references - lvalues-rvalue binding http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2749263/c0x-rvalue-references-lvalues-rvalue-binding const legacy_string defined in a header somewhere not modifiable. void f legacy_string s1 legacy_string s2 A new C 0x function..
What exactly is a reentrant function? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2799023/what-exactly-is-a-reentrant-function can smell a problem if your function has gives access to a modifiable persistent resource or has gives access to a function that smells..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/357600/is-const-cast-safe that takes a parameter of a const char and you pass in a modifiable char it's safe to const_cast that parameter back to a char and.. printf param s n param ... char buffer 16 const char unmodifiable string constant func buffer sizeof buffer true OK func unmodifiable.. string constant func buffer sizeof buffer true OK func unmodifiable strlen unmodifiable false OK func unmodifiable strlen unmodifiable..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5503352/const-before-or-const-after be used to make either an object's data or a pointer not modifiable or both. const Object obj can't change data Object const obj.. const on the left of the type to specify it's data is not modifiable as I find it reads better in my left to right mindset but which..
Does C++ support compile-time counters? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6166337/does-c-support-compile-time-counters functional language and as such lacks global variables or modifiable state which would implement such a counter. Or is it Example..
If temporaries are implicitly non-modifiable, how does this work? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6466253/if-temporaries-are-implicitly-non-modifiable-how-does-this-work temporaries are implicitly non modifiable how does this work I'm told that in C 03 temporaries are implicitly.. work I'm told that in C 03 temporaries are implicitly non modifiable. However the following compiles for me on GCC 4.3.4 in C 03.. I'm told that in C 03 temporaries are implicitly non modifiable. That is not correct. Temporaries are created among other circumstances..
Using assignment as a condition expression? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6807393/using-assignment-as-a-condition-expression operators all of which group right to left. All require a modifiable lvalue as their left operand and the type of an assignment expression..
Return type of '?:' (ternary conditional operator) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8535226/return-type-of-ternary-conditional-operator
|