¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: lambdasInferring the call signature of a lambda or arbitrary callable for “make_function” http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11893141/inferring-the-call-signature-of-a-lambda-or-arbitrary-callable-for-make-functio mem_fn for instance in Using Boost adaptors with C 11 lambdas where a copy assignable and default constructible type is required... a fairly nasty non library solution using the fact that lambdas have operator template typename T struct remove_class template..
How to make generic computations over heterogeneous argument packs of a variadic template function? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14261183/how-to-make-generic-computations-over-heterogeneous-argument-packs-of-a-variadic x args... Do something with x... cout endl Finally since lambdas are just syntactic sugar for functors they can be used as well.. with the algorithms above however until generic lambdas will be supported by C this is only possible for homogeneous..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14677997/stdfunction-vs-template is unavoidable e.g. if you want to write recursive lambdas however these restrictions are more dictated by technological..
How are you using C++11 today? [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1754397/how-are-you-using-c11-today the smart disappeared from the code. STL algorithms with lambdas just rock and initilizer lists make me so happy. Auto keyword..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1930903/bind-vs-lambda bind share improve this question As you said bind and lambdas don't quite exactly aim at the same goal. For instance for using.. goal. For instance for using and composing STL algorithms lambdas are clear winners IMHO. To illustrate I remember a really funny..
sum of elements in a `std::vector` http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3221812/sum-of-elements-in-a-stdvector vector.end 0 #include numeric 3 C 0x only using lambdas std for_each vector.begin vector.end int n sum_of_elems n 4..
Can lambda functions be templated? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3575901/can-lambda-functions-be-templated improve this question At it stands sadly no. Polymorphic lambdas would be excellent in terms of flexibility and power. The original.. Simpler was just to drop it all and stick to monomorphic lambdas. However with the removal of concepts from C 0x polymorphic.. However with the removal of concepts from C 0x polymorphic lambdas become a simple proposition again. However I can't find any..
C++11 features in Visual Studio 2012 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7421825/c11-features-in-visual-studio-2012 Studio 2010 rvalue references to version 2.1 from 2.0 lambdas to version 1.1 from 1.0. decltype to version 1.1 from 1.0 not..
What is a lambda expression in C++11? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7627098/what-is-a-lambda-expression-in-c11 function in C 03. The new solution C 11 introduces lambdas allow you to write an inline anonymous functor to replace the.. 0.00001 0 d however when you start to write more complex lambdas you will quickly encounter cases where the return type cannot..
using declaration in variadic template http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7870498/using-declaration-in-variadic-template operator doesn't seem to work lambda_visitor Lambdas... lambdas boost static_visitor ReturnType Lambdas lambdas ... I'm not.. Lambdas... lambdas boost static_visitor ReturnType Lambdas lambdas ... I'm not sure what would be the right syntax of adding using.. Lambdas... operator lambda_visitor Lambda1 l1 Lambdas... lambdas Lambda1 l1 lambda_visitor ReturnType Lambdas... lambdas... template..
Will C++0x support __stdcall or extern “C” capture-nothing lambdas? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2935201/will-c0x-support-stdcall-or-extern-c-capture-nothing-lambdas c c lambda c 11 share improve this question Lambdas without a capture are implicitly convertible to a pointer to..
C/C++: switch for non-integers http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4165131/c-c-switch-for-non-integers have a look. NOTE Only tested with g . Update C 11 Lambdas and initializier list make things much prettier no macros involved..
C++11 and the Lack of Polymorphic Lambdas - Why? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4643039/c11-and-the-lack-of-polymorphic-lambdas-why 11 and the Lack of Polymorphic Lambdas Why I've been reviewing the draft version of the C 11 standard...
best way to do variant visitation with lambdas http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7867555/best-way-to-do-variant-visitation-with-lambdas vector int var_t template typename ReturnType typename... Lambdas struct lambda_visitor public boost static_visitor ReturnType.. public boost static_visitor ReturnType public Lambdas... lambda_visitor Lambdas... lambdas Lambdas lambdas ... template.. static_visitor ReturnType public Lambdas... lambda_visitor Lambdas... lambdas Lambdas lambdas ... template typename ReturnType..
using declaration in variadic template http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7870498/using-declaration-in-variadic-template the following template typename ReturnType typename... Lambdas struct lambda_visitor public boost static_visitor ReturnType.. public boost static_visitor ReturnType public Lambdas... using Lambdas... operator doesn't seem to work lambda_visitor.. boost static_visitor ReturnType public Lambdas... using Lambdas... operator doesn't seem to work lambda_visitor Lambdas... lambdas..
|