¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: initialising

Access violation writing location 0xXXXXXXXX

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10373427/access-violation-writing-location-0xxxxxxxxx

another program. void main int a size int a new int size initialising an int array dynamically contains 16777216 el srand time NULL..

What do the following phrases mean in C++: zero-, default- and value-initialization?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1613341/what-do-the-following-phrases-mean-in-c-zero-default-and-value-initializat

default ctor struct C C m ~C int m non POD default initialising m int main char buf sizeof B memset buf 0x5a sizeof buf use..

Cannot dequeue a node in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19075751/cannot-dequeue-a-node-in-c

as the variables in your class. So your constructor is not initialising your class at all. BTW you should get into the habit of using..

C++ - what does the colon after a constructor mean? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2785612/c-what-does-the-colon-after-a-constructor-mean

it seems to have been generally accepted as the way of initialising variables so it's clear to other programmers reading your code...

Do the parentheses after the type name make a difference with new?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/620137/do-the-parentheses-after-the-type-name-make-a-difference-with-new

default ctor struct C C m ~C int m non POD default initialising m In a C 98 compiler the following should occur new A indeterminate..

why is initializing an integer in VC++ to 010 different from initialising it to 10?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6359418/why-is-initializing-an-integer-in-vc-to-010-different-from-initialising-it-to

is initializing an integer in VC to 010 different from initialising it to 10 when an integer is initialized as int a 010 a is actually..

Can this macro be converted to a function?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/95500/can-this-macro-be-converted-to-a-function

of a new name. The array size is then worked out by initialising a constant via that new name. In such case one may as well simply..

Make Meyers' Singleton thread safe and fast with lazy evaluation

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9994476/make-meyers-singleton-thread-safe-and-fast-with-lazy-evaluation

make a Meyers singleton creation totally thread safe by initialising it i.e. accessing it the first time before you create threads..