¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: inappropriatePossible compiler bug in Visual C++ 2012 (x86)? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13051930/possible-compiler-bug-in-visual-c-2012-x86 stack and store it in an XMM register. But the optimizer inappropriate removes that code entirely as though it assumes that the function..
C++ standard wording: Does “through all iterators in the range” imply sequentiality? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14823732/c-standard-wording-does-through-all-iterators-in-the-range-imply-sequential
Do pointers to string literals remain valid after a function returns? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1588976/do-pointers-to-string-literals-remain-valid-after-a-function-returns œarray of const wchar_t. p Rationale This avoids calling an inappropriate overloaded function which might expect to be able to modify..
How to avoid code duplication implementing const and non-const iterators? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2150192/how-to-avoid-code-duplication-implementing-const-and-non-const-iterators leads to virtual methods or method hiding which seem inappropriate here. Perhaps FooIterator should contain a FooConstIterator..
How to enable core dump in my Linux C++ program http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2919378/how-to-enable-core-dump-in-my-linux-c-program created when an application has done for example something inappropriate. The name of the file on my system is core. process pid here..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3404372/stdcall-and-cdecl convention as cdecl or the other way round would this be inappropriate In general can we say that which call will be faster cdecl or..
What exactly was the rationale behind introducing references in c++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4716426/what-exactly-was-the-rationale-behind-introducing-references-in-c where passing an object by value would be inefficient or inappropriate the user can pass a pointer. This strategy doesn't work where..
Constructor called on an already created object http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5038950/constructor-called-on-an-already-created-object share improve this question First off the c tag is inappropriate since constructors are a C only feature. I'll assume the code..
Why isn't operator overloading for pointers allowed to work? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6171630/why-isnt-operator-overloading-for-pointers-allowed-to-work where passing an object by value would be inefficient or inappropriate the user can pass a pointer. This strategy doesn ™t work where..
Does std::vector *have* to move objects when growing capacity? Or, can allocators “reallocate”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8003233/does-stdvector-have-to-move-objects-when-growing-capacity-or-can-allocator any penalty. Is there any problem that makes this feature inappropriate or undesirable for C Perhaps the only container that could take..
Could operator overloading have worked without references? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8007832/could-operator-overloading-have-worked-without-references where passing an object by value would be inefficient or inappropriate the user can pass a pointer. This strategy doesn't work where..
|