c++ Programming Glossary: diagnostic

Will an 'empty' destructor do the same thing as the generated destructor?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1025313/will-an-empty-destructor-do-the-same-thing-as-the-generated-destructor

If you do then the compiler will display an appropriate diagnostic. Now if you provide one explicitly struct A private ~A struct.. call the destructor of the base class and will cause a diagnostic already at definition time of ~B . There is another difference..

What is the difference between NULL, '\0' and 0

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1296843/what-is-the-difference-between-null-0-and-0

guaranteed and the compiler has to produce at least one diagnostic message warning or error according to the C Standard. Note that..

Why aren't my include guards preventing recursive inclusion and multiple symbol definitions?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14909997/why-arent-my-include-guards-preventing-recursive-inclusion-and-multiple-symbol

function or variable that is odr used in that program no diagnostic required. The definition can appear explicitly in the program..

Why not to use Turbo C++? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1961828/why-not-to-use-turbo-c

The compiler has bugs and does not issue proper diagnostic messages for erroneous programs.. You end up learning C with..

In C++, is it safe/portable to use static member function pointer for C API callbacks?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2068022/in-c-is-it-safe-portable-to-use-static-member-function-pointer-for-c-api-call

violation of this rule on type identity does not require a diagnostic. 3.5 10 Note linkage to non C declarations can be achieved using..

Can main function call itself in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2128321/can-main-function-call-itself-in-c

for those rules containing an explicit notation that 𦨭o diagnostic is required or which are described as resulting in 崬ndefined.. rule a conforming implementation shall issue at least one diagnostic message except that If a program contains a violation of a rule.. If a program contains a violation of a rule for which no diagnostic is required this International Standard places no requirement..

Undefined, unspecified and implementation-defined behavior

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2397984/undefined-unspecified-and-implementation-defined-behavior

of the environment with or without the issuance of a diagnostic message to terminating a translation or execution with the issuance.. a translation or execution with the issuance of a diagnostic message . What can you do to avoid running into undefined behavior..

Why does C++ require a cast for malloc() but C doesn't?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3477741/why-does-c-require-a-cast-for-malloc-but-c-doesnt

Casting the result of malloc in C will supress a useful diagnostic if you forget to include stdlib.h or otherwise don't have a.. for malloc and you leave off the cast you'll get a diagnostic to the effect that you're trying to assign incompatible types.. int to pointer . If you cast the result you supress the diagnostic and will potentially have runtime issues since it's not guaranteed..

what is/are the purpose(s) of inline?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3647053/what-is-are-the-purposes-of-inline

inline in all translation units in which it appears no diagnostic is required. An inline function with external linkage shall..

Undefined Behavior and Sequence Points

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4176328/undefined-behavior-and-sequence-points

of the environment with or with out the issuance of a diagnostic message to terminating a translation or execution with the issuance.. a translation or execution with the issuance of a diagnostic message . In short undefined behaviour means anything can happen..

What exactly is One Definition Rule in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4192170/what-exactly-is-one-definition-rule-in-c

inline function or object that is used in that program no diagnostic required. The definition can appear explicitly in the program..

Is there a C pre-processor which eliminates #ifdef blocks based on values defined/undefined?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/525283/is-there-a-c-pre-processor-which-eliminates-ifdef-blocks-based-on-values-define

not sure whether that's truly helpful except as a backup diagnostic. Whatever else it does though the pseudo pre processor must..

Why would one replace default new and delete operators?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7149461/why-would-one-replace-default-new-and-delete-operators

of the offending pointer thus helping in providing a good diagnostic information. To Improve Efficiency speed memory The new and.. by replacing the custom new and delete and adding the diagnostic collection mechanism in the overloaded new and delete . To compensate..