c++ Programming Glossary: danton

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10783391/is-it-possible-to-move-a-boostoptional

constructor or copy move assignment or a destructor As Luc Danton suggets there needs to be a cure for that. Let's try using swap..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12612488/aliasing-t-with-char-is-allowed-is-it-also-allowed-the-other-way-around

For more detailed information see answers by @Luc Danton @Cheers and hth. Alf and @David Rodr穩guez. c c language lawyer..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5930826/how-to-enable-experimental-c11-concurrency-features-in-mingw

they can be swapped without issues. EDIT Thanks to Luc Danton for digging out the mailing list thread mentioned above http..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6755673/c-conversion-operator-for-converting-to-function-pointer

Update I've been informed by Johannes Schraub and Luc Danton that this syntax is in fact not valid and that you really must..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7458110/c-unified-assignment-operator-move-semantics

and be explicit about it edit to include suggestion by Luc Danton template class C typename std enable_if std is_nothrow_move_assignable..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8116808/read-integers-from-a-text-file-with-c-ifstream

loop. We need an auxiliary construction credits to @ Luc Danton that does the opposite of std move namespace std template typename..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8782895/why-doesnt-emplace-back-use-uniform-initialization

cplusplus.github.com LWG lwg active.html#2089 Also Luc Danton helped me understand the difficulty Direct vs uniform initialization..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9998402/c11-does-not-deduce-type-when-stdfunction-or-lambda-functions-are-involved

directly creating a std function EDIT Per advice of Luc Danton in the comments here is an alternative to the function I had..