¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: arguablyWhat is the rationale in allowing `?` to be escaped? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11241313/what-is-the-rationale-in-allowing-to-be-escaped different escape sequences in each for no benefit and arguably a slight detriment. is for avoiding trigraphs is a trigraph..
reason why custom loop is faster? bad compiler? unsafe custom code? luck?(lucky cache hits) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11529778/reason-why-custom-loop-is-faster-bad-compiler-unsafe-custom-code-lucklucky ebp edx mov DWORD PTR _a ebp ecx Line 35 call _clock While arguably less clever than your second loop modern CPUs tend to do best..
C++11: Compile Time Calculation of Array http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12108390/c11-compile-time-calculation-of-array
Aliasing `T*` with `char*` is allowed. Is it also allowed the other way around? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12612488/aliasing-t-with-char-is-allowed-is-it-also-allowed-the-other-way-around or anything magic at all. static_cast via cv void is arguably fine for the job although I do feel like the Standard could..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/146850/c-versus-d the quality of the language itself. As a pure language D arguably has many advantages over C and Java. At the very least it is..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1615215/does-asp-net-support-c you which means comparatively more coding for you however arguably a C programmer is accustomed to not having a lot of visual design..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2294746/builders-in-java-versus-c is that of named arguments or rather their lack of . An arguably more C like solution to this problem might be Boost's Parameter..
In what situation do you use a semaphore over a mutex in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2350544/in-what-situation-do-you-use-a-semaphore-over-a-mutex-in-c but don't have priority inversion avoidance. They're arguably harder to use than condition variables because they require..
Can I use a binary literal in C or C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2611764/can-i-use-a-binary-literal-in-c-or-c can use BOOST_BINARY while waiting for C 0x. BOOST_BINARY arguably has an advantage over template implementation insofar as it..
Use the right tool for the job: embedded programming http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2855884/use-the-right-tool-for-the-job-embedded-programming that cannot support Java of which there are many so it is arguably less portable than a well designed C or C implementation with..
How far to go with a strongly typed language? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3181766/how-far-to-go-with-a-strongly-typed-language maximum const value_type value void const return mValue arguably dangerous operator const value_type void const return mValue..
What is the copy-and-swap idiom? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3279543/what-is-the-copy-and-swap-idiom are straightforward the copy assignment operator is arguably the most nuanced and difficult. How should it be done What pitfalls..
ofstream doesn't write buffer to file http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3279733/ofstream-doesnt-write-buffer-to-file find an implementation where it wouldn't work. Still it's arguably better to maintain guaranteed behavior. I do suspect the issue..
Should every class have a virtual destructor? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/353817/should-every-class-have-a-virtual-destructor On the gripping hand having a virtual destructor arguably advertises that this type is meant to be used polymorphically...
Using operator[] on empty std::vector http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3829788/using-operator-on-empty-stdvector n for int i 0 i n i do something delete raw_array While arguably redundant the above code is perfectly legal I believe while..
RAII and smart pointers in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/395123/raii-and-smart-pointers-in-c by the time the caller gets the pointer it's useless and arguably worse than useless since using it could cause all sorts of funky..
Smart pointers in container like std::vector? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4577838/smart-pointers-in-container-like-stdvector options are Use the Boost Smart Pointers library . This is arguably your best option. Use primitive pointers. This is fast and safe..
Does there exist a static_warning? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8936063/does-there-exist-a-static-warning being compiled with T int Clang 3.1 on Linux produces the arguably nicer output color not shown tst3.cpp 1 1 warning '_' is deprecated..
|