¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: fundamentalWhy not use pointers for everything in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1064325/why-not-use-pointers-for-everything-in-c the heap so I'll have to delete it later on. Is there any fundamental difference between the two Why should I prefer one over the..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1115876/autocompletion-in-vim accepted Vim's lack in this area until now. But I think a fundamental level of code completion isn't too much to ask and is in fact..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1120140/csv-parser-in-c http www.boost.org doc libs 1_35_0 libs spirit example fundamental list_parser.cpp I've never used Boost's Spirit but am willing..
Why isn't sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/119123/why-isnt-sizeof-for-a-struct-equal-to-the-sum-of-sizeof-of-each-member for better performance. Many processors perform best when fundamental data types are stored at byte addresses that are multiples of..
Why aren't my include guards preventing recursive inclusion and multiple symbol definitions? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14909997/why-arent-my-include-guards-preventing-recursive-inclusion-and-multiple-symbol on StackOverflow from people having troubles because of a fundamental misunderstanding of what include guards are what problems they..
How to pass parameters correctly? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15600499/how-to-pass-parameters-correctly result of calling std move . One could also argue that for fundamental types or types for which copying is fast such as int bool or..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1613230/uses-of-c-comma-operator procedural programming language normally supports such fundamental constructs as sequencing and branching . These fundamental constructs.. fundamental constructs as sequencing and branching . These fundamental constructs are present in C C languages in two forms one for..
Is it good practice to NULL a pointer after deleting it? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1931126/is-it-good-practice-to-null-a-pointer-after-deleting-it can't hurt but it's often a bit of a band aid over a more fundamental problem Why are you using a pointer in the first place I can..
Why does C# not provide the C++ style 'friend' keyword? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/203616/why-does-c-sharp-not-provide-the-c-style-friend-keyword the relationships between classes and undermines some fundamental attributes of an OO language. That being said it is a nice feature..
References Needed for Implementing an Interpreter in C/C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/294852/references-needed-for-implementing-an-interpreter-in-c-c What I'm really looking for is reading material on the fundamentals of implementing interpreters. I did some browsing of SO and.. like a fun read. Not sure it will provide me with the fundamentals. Scheme from Scratch . Peter Michaux is attacking various implementations.. share improve this question Short answer The fundamental reading list for a lisp interpreter is SICP. I would not at..
Is `long` guaranteed to be at least 32 bits? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4329777/is-long-guaranteed-to-be-at-least-32-bits I have always understood that the sizes of the integral fundamental types in C were as follows sizeof char sizeof short int sizeof.. set. 1.7 1 defines this in more concrete terms The fundamental storage unit in the C memory model is the byte. A byte is at.. in the face of everything I understand the size of the fundamental types to be in C according to the Standard. Normally I would..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4421706/operator-overloading too so if you define operator be sure to follow the third fundamental rule of operator overloading and also define all the other boolean..
Why the sizeof(bool) is not defined to be one, by the Standard itself? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5067492/why-the-sizeofbool-is-not-defined-to-be-one-by-the-standard-itself char are 1 the result of sizeof applied to any other fundamental type 3.9.1 is implementation defined. Note in particular sizeof..
Why do all these crazy function pointer definitions all work? What is really going on? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6893285/why-do-all-these-crazy-function-pointer-definitions-all-work-what-is-really-goi these combinations of operators to work the same way. The fundamental reason why all of these work is that a function like foo is..
What's the difference between a header file and a library? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/924485/whats-the-difference-between-a-header-file-and-a-library library is the actual person you can reach there It's the fundamental difference between interface and implementation the interface.. is the actual functionality. Note The concept is so fundamental because it allows you flexibility you can have the same header..
In C++ I Cannot Grasp Pointers and Classes http://stackoverflow.com/questions/96285/in-c-i-cannot-grasp-pointers-and-classes aren't really advanced topics in C . They are pretty fundamental. For me pointers solidified when I started drawing boxes with..
|