¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: bloatlight-weight C++ image library http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11816571/light-weight-c-image-library opensource is a plus Built for speed No huge functional bloat like ImageMagik which is truly comprehensive but is a mammoth..
Capturing video out of an OpenGL window in Windows http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154730/capturing-video-out-of-an-opengl-window-in-windows not really an absolute requirement. In general the less bloat there is the better. On the other hand for reasons beyond this..
1D or 2D array, what's faster? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17259877/1d-or-2d-array-whats-faster most simplest and common 2D Data storage cases they just bloat the complexity of your code and reduce the performance and memory..
Are C++ Templates just Macros in disguise? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/180320/are-c-templates-just-macros-in-disguise compiler errors in places where you don't expect them Code bloat Difficulty in tracing code Setting Debugger Breakpoints c templates..
When are header-only libraries acceptable? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2174657/when-are-header-only-libraries-acceptable header only libraries but there are claims they cause code bloat due to over inlining as well as the other obvious problem of.. how much truth is there to these claims the one about bloat Furthermore are the costs 'justified' Obviously there are unavoidable.. not be worth the trouble. Furthermore the so called code bloat may have a negative impact on performance as more code to be..
C++ Templates: Convincing self against code bloat http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2918414/c-templates-convincing-self-against-code-bloat Templates Convincing self against code bloat I have heard about code bloats in context of C templates. I.. self against code bloat I have heard about code bloats in context of C templates. I know that is not the case with.. g specific tips I am interested for that too. PS Regarding bloat I am concerned even for the slightest of bloats since I come..
C++ template function compiles in header but not implementation http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3040480/c-template-function-compiles-in-header-but-not-implementation compilers harder to debug con and maybe increasing code bloat con . 2 Put the implementation in x.cpp and #include x.cpp from..
OneOfAType container — storing one each of a given type in a container — am I off base here? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3221501/oneofatype-container-storing-one-each-of-a-given-type-in-a-container-am-i But I can see you concerns with RTTI and the associated bloat . As a matter of fact an any value container does not need RTTI..
What is the copy-and-swap idiom? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3279543/what-is-the-copy-and-swap-idiom and the copy but with more complex resources this code bloat can be quite a hassle. We should strive to never repeat ourselves...
Why is inlining considered faster than a function call? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4016061/why-is-inlining-considered-faster-than-a-function-call of calling a function really that heavy and worth the bloat of having it inlined From what I can remember when a function.. price of that is obviously the potential danger of code bloat but if used correctly it can provide noticeable performance..
Use of typename keyword with template function parameters http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4347730/use-of-typename-keyword-with-template-function-parameters to take this name as a type. It would also further bloat the already complicated Standard beyond belief. Let's again..
Does ScopeGuard use really lead to better code? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/48647/does-scopeguard-use-really-lead-to-better-code calls. On the other hand explicit catch blocks would bloat the code and introduce subtle errors because the code flow gets..
How to implement the factory pattern in C++ correctly http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5120768/how-to-implement-the-factory-pattern-in-c-correctly performance hit and preferably a significant code bloat hit especially at client side be general as in possible to be..
Why is the linux kernel not implemented in C++? [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/520068/why-is-the-linux-kernel-not-implemented-in-c performing dynamic dispatch. Templates cause massive code bloat. This is potentially true. However the Linux kernel uses macros..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6866206/volatile-and-createthread you'll have to make every write volatile . This would bloat your code be very error prone and become slow as it prevents..
Is there any real risk to deriving from the C++ STL containers? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/922248/is-there-any-real-risk-to-deriving-from-the-c-stl-containers template X Charges will use the same code so no pointless bloat. Both approaches are superior to using a raw container because..
|