c# Programming Glossary: atomic

For i = 0, why is (i += i++) equal to 0?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13516689/for-i-0-why-is-i-i-equal-to-0

it is made of requires one to know that both and are not atomic that is neither one is a single operation even if they look..

Volatile vs. Interlocked vs. lock

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/154551/volatile-vs-interlocked-vs-lock

who never write and if the thing you're writing is an atomic value. As soon as you do a single read modify write you need..

reference assignment is atomic so why is Interlocked.Exchange(ref Object, Object) needed?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2192124/reference-assignment-is-atomic-so-why-is-interlocked-exchangeref-object-object

assignment is atomic so why is Interlocked.Exchange ref Object Object needed In.. _allData newData. This should work since the assignment is atomic and the threads that have the reference to old data keep using.. platforms it's not guaranteed that reference assignment is atomic. Moreover when I declare the _allData field as volatile the..

Multiple/single instance of Linq to SQL DataContext

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/226127/multiple-single-instance-of-linq-to-sql-datacontext

and retrieving the DataContext is a pain. DataContext per atomic action you lose the ability to track changes since one DataContext..

Checking for null before event dispatching… thread safe?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/282653/checking-for-null-before-event-dispatching-thread-safe

In addition assignment of an object reference in .NET is atomic and the default implementations of the add and remove event..

Is the ++ operator thread safe? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4628243/is-the-operator-thread-safe

you are concerned about here is whether the operation is atomic or not. An atomic operation is one which is guaranteed to not.. about here is whether the operation is atomic or not. An atomic operation is one which is guaranteed to not be halfway complete.. of other threading problems that have nothing to do with atomicity but which may still fall under some people's definitions..

C# thread safety with get/set

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/505515/c-sharp-thread-safety-with-get-set

certain what you're trying to achieve but if you just want atomic access to the object then couldn't you have the calling code..

MVC Razor view nested foreach's model

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8894442/mvc-razor-view-nested-foreachs-model

So Func or Action once you have them they are pretty much atomic. All you can really do is Invoke them aka tell them to do the..

Is accessing a variable in C# an atomic operation?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9666/is-accessing-a-variable-in-c-sharp-an-atomic-operation

accessing a variable in C# an atomic operation I've been raised to believe that if multiple threads.. to it at the same time Are reads and writes of variables atomic c# multithreading share improve this question For the definitive.. memory locations no larger than the native word size is atomic when all the write accesses to a location are the same size...