¡@
javascript Programming Glossary: interpretersDo browsers parse javascript on every page load? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1096907/do-browsers-parse-javascript-on-every-page-load and run on a VM this isn't really the case with the modern interpreters which tend to compile the source directly into machine code..
Python library for rendering HTML and javascript http://stackoverflow.com/questions/126131/python-library-for-rendering-html-and-javascript outside of a browser. You can use stand alone javascript interpreters like Rhino and SpiderMonkey to run javascript code but they..
JavaScript closures vs. anonymous functions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12930272/javascript-closures-vs-anonymous-functions being alerted. What do we infer from this JavaScript interpreters do not treat closures differently from the way they treat other..
javascript, circular references and memory leaks http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1999840/javascript-circular-references-and-memory-leaks From what I recall of a not too distant past Javascript interpreters suffered from memory leaking issues when faced with circular..
What's the difference between compiled and interpreted language? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2657268/whats-the-difference-between-compiled-and-interpreted-language syntax tree as is done for many prototype or educational interpreters A tokenized representation of the source program similar to..
Comparing Arrays of Objects in JavaScript http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27030/comparing-arrays-of-objects-in-javascript current common browser based implementations of JavaScript interpreters. To answer the original question one way you could do this and..
Can a JavaScript object have a prototype chain, but also be a function? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/340383/can-a-javascript-object-have-a-prototype-chain-but-also-be-a-function and cannot inherit it from whatever you like. Well in some interpreters you can but you cannot do it safely across all interpreters.. you can but you cannot do it safely across all interpreters &mdash the standard says you doth not mess with standard objects..
Is JavaScript 's “new” Keyword Considered Harmful? [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/383402/is-javascript-s-new-keyword-considered-harmful each method. On slower machines or especially slower JS interpreters when many objects being created this can mean a significant..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/390992/javascript-parser-in-python that provides a framework for constructing recognizers interpreters compilers and translators from grammatical descriptions containing..
how to write setTimeout with params by Coffeescript http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6459630/how-to-write-settimeout-with-params-by-coffeescript call to every setTimeout you make but in today's JS interpreters the performance drawback is insignificant unless you're doing..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6511556/javascript-parser-for-java if Expression since those don't work on IE and many other interpreters. Recognizes const since many interpreters do not IE but warns... and many other interpreters. Recognizes const since many interpreters do not IE but warns. Allows but warns on trailing commas in.. keywords as identifier names but warns since different interpreters have different keyword sets. This allows us to use an expansive..
Does creating functions consume more memory http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7451279/does-creating-functions-consume-more-memory when using the other approach. However one would expect interpreters can optimize this. So that there is only one copy of the function.. overhead then a new function for each object. Do modern JS interpreters optimise Case A so there is only one copy of the function foo.. Yes creating functions uses more memory. ... and no interpreters don't optimize Case A down to a single function. The reason..
What is the order of evaluation for function arguments in Javascript? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8405989/what-is-the-order-of-evaluation-for-function-arguments-in-javascript b a but that was widely recognized as a spec error major interpreters did not implement it that way and it was fixed in EcmaScript..
|