¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: lockinghttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1008019/c-singleton-design-pattern method See this article that explains why double checked locking will not work on C What are all the common undefined behaviour..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/105014/does-the-mutable-keyword-have-any-purpose-other-than-allowing-the-variable-to way that is visible through the public interface like your locking example. Another example would be a class that computes a value..
Examples of when a bitwise swap() is a bad idea? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11638271/examples-of-when-a-bitwise-swap-is-a-bad-idea is normally disabled If the class needs any sort of locking to copy It's easy to accidentally pass in two different types..
C++ Socket Server - Unable to saturate CPU http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1234750/c-socket-server-unable-to-saturate-cpu triggered events but getting it right without excessive locking can be quite tricky. BTW I have been doing some work in this..
Does C++ support 'finally' blocks? (And what's this 'RAII' I keep hearing about?) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/161177/does-c-support-finally-blocks-and-whats-this-raii-i-keep-hearing-about explanation of the topic. A common use for RAII is locking a mutex A class with implements RAII class lock mutex m_ public.. and 'lock' objects class foo mutex mutex_ mutex for locking 'foo' object public void bar lock scopeLock mutex_ lock object...
How to use SQLite in a multi-threaded application? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1680249/how-to-use-sqlite-in-a-multi-threaded-application write to a database file anyway. See http www.sqlite.org lockingv3.html . In section 3.0 A RESERVED lock means that the process.. Check out this link . The easiest way is to do the locking yourself and to avoid sharing the connection between threads...
How to handle a ctrl-break signal in a command line interface http://stackoverflow.com/questions/181413/how-to-handle-a-ctrl-break-signal-in-a-command-line-interface I'm having is all of the console functions I can find are blocking which means that I can't detect that I need to exit from my.. mis understand this I know how this could be done using locking and releasing the resources from the signaling thread but this..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/244316/reader-writer-locks-in-c a Windows only one would be acceptable. c multithreading locking share improve this question Newer versions of boost thread..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2504178/lru-cache-design this being O 1 you can do a multithreaded version by just locking the whole structure. You don't have to worry about granular.. whole structure. You don't have to worry about granular locking etc. Briefly the way it works On an access of a value you move..
Finding C++ static initialization order problems http://stackoverflow.com/questions/335369/finding-c-static-initialization-order-problems of threads. Please note DO NOT use the double checked locking pattern to try an optimize away the locking. This will not work.. double checked locking pattern to try an optimize away the locking. This will not work in C Creation Problems On creation there..
When to use volatile with multi threading? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4557979/when-to-use-volatile-with-multi-threading via a mutex isn't it But in that case between the thread locking and releasing the mutex the code is in a critical section where..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6319146/c11-introduced-a-standardized-memory-model-what-does-it-mean-and-how-is-it-g lower level primitives e.g. the classic double checked locking pattern . The new standard provides high level gadgets like..
Is cout synchronized/thread-safe? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6374264/is-cout-synchronized-thread-safe not synchronized it is up to the user to do appropriate locking. However do things like cout get special treatment in the standard..
Is it smart to replace boost::thread and boost::mutex with c++11 equivalents? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7241993/is-it-smart-to-replace-boostthread-and-boostmutex-with-c11-equivalents has a boost shared_mutex for multiple reader single writer locking which is not present in C 11 C 11 timeouts are different to..
Singleton: How should it be used http://stackoverflow.com/questions/86582/singleton-how-should-it-be-used DDJ_Jul_Aug_2004_revised.pdf For problems associated with locking in multi threaded applications Limitation If you use this Singleton..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/871234/circular-lock-free-buffer of data coming in could be huge so i wanted to reduce my locking overhead especially writer locks for the producers. I think.. as it can let's call the head of the buffer A without blocking unless the buffer is full when A meets the end of buffer Z...
Why are strings immutable in many programming languages? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9544182/why-are-strings-immutable-in-many-programming-languages
|