c++ Programming Glossary: harmless

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/132667/how-to-disable-pragma-warnings

which produced a huge amount of warnings related with a harmless #pragma directive being used. .. File.hpp 1 warning ignoring..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/183788/c-c-compiler-warnings-do-you-clean-up-all-your-code-to-remove-them-or-leave

clean up any warning. Even the ones that you know are harmless if such a thing exists will give a bad impression of you to..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/245742/examples-of-good-gotos-in-c-or-c

of your brain power on this trifle I can live with the harmless and idiomatic for and while true just as well if I want to keep..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/273209/are-memory-leaks-ever-ok

it in and there could be circumstances where it was harmless if I saw this question posted on SurgeonOverflow.com and saw..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8026040/conversion-from-derived-to-base

As long as you only inspect the bowl the conversion is harmless. But as soon as you start modifying it the conversion becomes..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8747005/backporting-nullptr-to-c-pre-c0x-programs

in this namespace and adding a typedef should be pretty harmless. That is I would define nullptr_t in a different namespace than..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9322174/move-assignment-operator-and-if-this-rhs

And in our dumb_array example this will be perfectly harmless if we simply omit the assert or constrain it to the moved from..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9661936/inheritance-a-is-an-inaccessible-base-of-b

wrong with allowing this type of code in C Looks totally harmless. c inheritance share improve this question By making the..