¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: conformanthttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1042855/boost-and-xml-c Expat by 2.8 times on test XML 2 more or less standard conformant it will parse any standard compliant file correctly with the..
What's “wrong” with C++ wchar_t and wstrings? What are some alternatives to wide characters? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11107608/whats-wrong-with-c-wchar-t-and-wstrings-what-are-some-alternatives-to-wide encodings aren't legal and Window's use of UTF 16 is non conformant. 2. Unicode allows many characters to be represented with multiple..
Questions about Hinnant's stack allocator http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11648202/questions-about-hinnants-stack-allocator that is being called . Is this the way to write C 11 conformant allocators What other changes are necessary to make the current.. other changes are necessary to make the current code C 11 conformant c c 11 memory alignment allocator exception specification .. that is being called . Is this the way to write C 11 conformant allocators Yes. However allocator_traits will do it for you...
When can outer braces be omitted in an initializer list? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11734861/when-can-outer-braces-be-omitted-in-an-initializer-list of double also like this to be completely the Standard conformant but it works without it. It seems I need to dig the spec again..
Is main() really start of a C++ program? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4783404/is-main-really-start-of-a-c-program warning So my question is Is this code really Standard conformant If it's standard conformant then does it not invalidate what.. Is this code really Standard conformant If it's standard conformant then does it not invalidate what the Standard says main is not..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5369770/bool-to-int-conversion this question int x 4 5 Completely portable. Standard conformant. bool to int conversion is implicit §4.7 4 from the C Standard..
What is the meaning of “… …” token? i.e. double ellipsis operator on parameter pack http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5625600/what-is-the-meaning-of-token-i-e-double-ellipsis-operator-on-paramet worst pseudo operator ever. Edit This does appear to be conformant. §8.3.5 3 describes one way to form the parameter list as parameter..
C++ - How to set file permissions (cross platform) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/592448/c-how-to-set-file-permissions-cross-platform on Linux. Windows supports what they call an ISO C conformant version of chmod 2 . This API is called _chmod and it is similar..
Do the parentheses after the type name make a difference with new? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/620137/do-the-parentheses-after-the-type-name-make-a-difference-with-new new C default construct C m is zero initialized In a C 03 conformant compiler things should work like so new A indeterminate value..
Pure virtual destructor in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/630950/pure-virtual-destructor-in-c handler and crash. Edit fixing the declaration to be more conformant compiled with http www.comeaucomputing.com tryitout share..
C-callback to function template: explicitly instantiate template http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6734492/c-callback-to-function-template-explicitly-instantiate-template p_to_function . So it's probably your best bet to write C conformant code that relies on the implementation. share improve this..
Why would one replace default new and delete operators? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7149461/why-would-one-replace-default-new-and-delete-operators entry to this FAQ is How should I write ISO C standard conformant custom new and delete operators Note The answer is based on..
How should I write ISO C++ Standard conformant custom new and delete operators? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7194127/how-should-i-write-iso-c-standard-conformant-custom-new-and-delete-operators should I write ISO C Standard conformant custom new and delete operators How should I write ISO C standard.. and delete operators How should I write ISO C standard conformant custom new and delete operators This is in continuation of Overloading.. new and delete operators Section 1 Writing a standard conformant new operator Part 1 Understanding the requirements for writing..
“No newline at end of file” compiler warning http://stackoverflow.com/questions/72271/no-newline-at-end-of-file-compiler-warning warning should no longer be issued if using C and a C 11 conformant compiler. From C 11 standard via James' post A source file that..
C++, variable declaration in 'if' expression http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7836867/c-variable-declaration-in-if-expression values that need to be tested So is what I want to do non conformant to the standard or is my compiler just busting my balls VS2008..
|