c++ Programming Glossary: comp.std.c

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14061694/could-multiple-proxy-classes-make-up-a-stl-proof-bitvector

on @HowardHinnant 's answer and this ancient discussion on comp.std.c You can come a long way to almost mimic the builtin types for..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1887097/variable-length-arrays-in-c

spread all over memory. EDIT Looking at the discussion at comp.std.c it's clear that this question is pretty controversial with some..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1921817/template-type-deduction-in-c-for-class-vs-function

subjective. There's been some discussion about this in comp.std.c and the consensus seems to be that there's no reason why it..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2169932/non-class-rvalues-always-have-cv-unqualified-types

of the standard soon. Edit I've just submitted a post on comp.std.c noting the problem and suggesting new wording for the relevant..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2537716/why-is-partial-specialziation-of-a-nested-class-template-allowed-while-complete

doesn't really make sense for me. Unfortunatly nobody at comp.std.c dared to answer so I am putting it up here again with a bounty...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/307343/forward-declare-an-stl-container

of a standard C header is worth that. See the following comp.std.c .moderated discussion forward declaring std vector. Works but..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4657976/checking-if-pointer-points-within-an-array

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4900739/why-are-designated-initializers-not-implemented-in-g

the C 0x standards it seems http groups.google.com group comp.std.c browse_thread thread 8b7331b0879045ad pli 1 Also why are you..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7458857/why-doesnt-c-support-dynamic-arrays-on-the-stack

the size of array. And as Florian Weimer asked here at comp.std.c that if C 0x allows VLA then what would the following code mean..