”@
c++ Programming Glossary: i.operatorUndefined Behavior and Sequence Points Reloaded http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4638364/undefined-behavior-and-sequence-points-reloaded behavior If yes why Is it not equivalent to writing i.operator i.operator or even syntactically simpler i.add i.inc Or do they.. If yes why Is it not equivalent to writing i.operator i.operator or even syntactically simpler i.add i.inc Or do they too invoke.. invoke undefined behavior. If so then it's equivalents i.operator i.operator and i.add i.inc must also invoke undefined behavior..
In C++11, how to determine what is 'sequenced before' others? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9562562/in-c11-how-to-determine-what-is-sequenced-before-others under C 98. If i was a class then the expression would be i.operator i.operator or i.operator operator i and all effects of the operator.. If i was a class then the expression would be i.operator i.operator or i.operator operator i and all effects of the operator call.. then the expression would be i.operator i.operator or i.operator operator i and all effects of the operator call are sequenced..
|