¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: hackedVery poor boost::lexical_cast performance http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1250795/very-poor-boostlexical-cast-performance If lexical_cast was so wrong someone would have hacked the library either with criticism or with code. I guess you..
When and how to use GCC's stack protection feature? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1629685/when-and-how-to-use-gccs-stack-protection-feature happening. Your users won't be happy but they won't be hacked either. This isn't the sort of hacking that is about cheating..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1756285/stack-size-estimation are some static checks and I think there even exists a hacked gcc version that tries to do this. The only thing I can tell..
C++ Suppress Automatic Initialization and Destruction http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2662417/c-suppress-automatic-initialization-and-destruction pointer math for me although this seems like a horribly hacked solution. Another solution would be to use malloc and free but..
Inserting and removing commas from integers in c++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/791258/inserting-and-removing-commas-from-integers-in-c do_thousands_sep function. There is an example . I also hacked up something that just solves your problem #include locale #include..
Is there a way to define variables of two different types in a for loop initializer? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/866012/is-there-a-way-to-define-variables-of-two-different-types-in-a-for-loop-initiali need to use i inside the loop just j . If you have totally hacked and obscure solution It's OK for me. In this contrived example..
Preferred standard use: range based for or std::for_each http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9994421/preferred-standard-use-range-based-for-or-stdfor-each values instead of the whole container. EDIT This can be hacked around using a simple range class providing begin and end members..
|