¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: conventionFinding current executable's path without /proc/self/exe http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1023306/finding-current-executables-path-without-proc-self-exe it could be set to anything by the calling program by convention it is set to either a path name of the executable or a name..
Weird MSC 8.0 error: “The value of ESP was not properly saved across a function call…” http://stackoverflow.com/questions/142644/weird-msc-8-0-error-the-value-of-esp-was-not-properly-saved-across-a-function a function pointer declared with a different calling convention. We have never even specified calling conventions __cdecl etc... calling convention. We have never even specified calling conventions __cdecl etc. for our functions leaving all the compiler switches.. and the project settings are consistent for calling convention across the library and test projects. Update One of our devs..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1610030/why-can-you-return-from-a-non-void-function-without-returning-a-value-without-pr std cout foo std endl will print 6 2 1 This is calling convention and architecture dependent. 2 The return value is the result..
How can I avoid including class implementation files? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2037880/how-can-i-avoid-including-class-implementation-files and will likely be much more constrained by precedent and convention. You can use an IDE which handles the same details for you but..
Is “argv[0] = name-of-executable” an accepted standard or just a common convention? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2050961/is-argv0-name-of-executable-an-accepted-standard-or-just-a-common-conventi of executable&rdquo an accepted standard or just a common convention When passing argument to main in a C or C application will.. be the name of the executable Or is this just a common convention and not guaranteed to be true 100 of the time c c standards..
In C++, is it safe/portable to use static member function pointer for C API callbacks? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2068022/in-c-is-it-safe-portable-to-use-static-member-function-pointer-for-c-api-call because class static functions often use the same calling convention as a C function. However doing that is a bug waiting to happen..
A call to PInvoke function '[…]' has unbalanced the stack http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2941960/a-call-to-pinvoke-function-has-unbalanced-the-stack this question Maybe the problem lies in the calling convention. Are you sure the unmanaged function was compiled as stdcall..
What does int argc, char *argv[] mean? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3024197/what-does-int-argc-char-argv-mean are named argc argument count and argv argument vector by convention but they can be given any valid identifier int main int num_args..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/317450/why-override-operator library they are overloading the operator. Is this a convention in C For callbacks etc. I have seen this in code of a co worker..
Pure virtual functions may not have an inline definition. Why? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4174694/pure-virtual-functions-may-not-have-an-inline-definition-why the certain fights over pure I used the tradition C and C convention of using 0 to represent not there. The 0 syntax fits with my..
How to implement the factory pattern in C++ correctly http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5120768/how-to-implement-the-factory-pattern-in-c-correctly less error prone. I like it that way. Having to drop that convention AND changing the design of my object just for the purpose of..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/592160/static-vs-extern-c-c That can but not must include the appropriate calling convention and the appropriate C language name mangling sometimes called.. If you have a static member function the calling convention for it is the one of your C compiler. Often they are the same..
Proper stack and heap usage in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/599308/proper-stack-and-heap-usage-in-c of a high level language look up call stack and calling convention and see what the machine really does when you call a function...
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/614302/c-header-order be in cpp scope not header scope but is there a set order convention best practice c header source share improve this question..
Compilers and argument order of evaluation in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/621542/compilers-and-argument-order-of-evaluation-in-c depends on the argument type the called function's calling convention the archtecture and the compiler. On an x86 the Pascal calling.. archtecture and the compiler. On an x86 the Pascal calling convention evaluates arguments left to right whereas in the C calling convention.. evaluates arguments left to right whereas in the C calling convention __cdecl it is right to left. Most programs which run on multiple..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/750178/typedef-pointers-a-good-idea good idea I looked through some code and noticed that the convention was to turn pointer types like SomeStruct into typedef SomeStruct.. Is there any merit to this c c pointers typedef conventions share improve this question This can be appropriate when..
|