c++ Programming Glossary: bad_alloc
returning aligned memory with new? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2660076/returning-aligned-memory-with-new if globalHandler globalHandler else throw std bad_alloc void operator delete void rawMemory if rawMemory 0 return do..
Critique my non-intrusive heap debugger http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2835416/critique-my-non-intrusive-heap-debugger void allocate size_t size kind_of_memory kind throw std bad_alloc byte raw static_cast byte malloc size 2 sizeof CANARY if raw.. byte malloc size 2 sizeof CANARY if raw 0 throw std bad_alloc memcpy raw CANARY sizeof CANARY byte payload raw sizeof CANARY.. p void operator new size_t size throw std bad_alloc return allocate size NON_ARRAY_MEMORY void operator new size_t..
Looking for C++ STL-like vector class but using stack storage http://stackoverflow.com/questions/354442/looking-for-c-stl-like-vector-class-but-using-stack-storage match_item 256 matches I was thinking it would throw std bad_alloc if it runs out of space although that should not ever happen...
How should a size-limited stl-like container be implemented? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3563591/how-should-a-size-limited-stl-like-container-be-implemented exception would make sense here if this size N throw std bad_alloc There is quite a bit of hand waving there... std vector take..
How do I call the original “operator new” if I have overloaded it? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4134195/how-do-i-call-the-original-operator-new-if-i-have-overloaded-it last argument to set_new_handler was a null pointer throw bad_alloc. Otherwise the function calls the current new_handler 18.4.2.2..
Will new return NULL in any case? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/550451/will-new-return-null-in-any-case new fails to allocate memory it is supposed to throw std bad_alloc exception. But I have heard that some compilers such as VC6.. using a custom new handler Operator new does not throw a bad_alloc exception on failure in Visual C If you have old code that was.. that you want new to return 0 instead of throwing std bad_alloc using the std nothrow parameter SomeType p new std nothrow SomeType..
overloading new/delete http://stackoverflow.com/questions/583003/overloading-new-delete VS2005 new.cpp void operator new size_t size _THROW1 _STD bad_alloc try to allocate size bytes void p while p malloc size 0 if _callnewh..
How should I write ISO C++ Standard conformant custom new and delete operators? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7194127/how-should-i-write-iso-c-standard-conformant-custom-new-and-delete-operators new as void operator new std size_t size throw std bad_alloc The C standard specifies the semantics that custom versions.. size then it should throw an exception of type std bad_alloc . But There is more to that than what meets the eye If you take..
Does dynamic memory allocation differ in C and C++ in popular implementations? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7443782/does-dynamic-memory-allocation-differ-in-c-and-c-in-popular-implementations void operator new std size_t sz throw std bad_alloc void p malloc 0 is unpredictable avoid it. if sz 0 sz 1 p void.. handler __new_handler if handler #ifdef __EXCEPTIONS throw bad_alloc #else std abort #endif handler p void malloc sz return p This..
How to properly replace global new & delete operators http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8186018/how-to-properly-replace-global-new-delete-operators optional_ops.cpp void operator new std size_t n throw std bad_alloc ... void operator delete void p throw ... There's no need for..
Array placement-new requires unspecified overhead in the buffer? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8720425/array-placement-new-requires-unspecified-overhead-in-the-buffer limit if n limit std cout life is good n else throw std bad_alloc return p int main alignas std string char buffer 100 std string..
Should I use an exception specifier in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/88573/should-i-use-an-exception-specifier-in-c code itoa e try std vector TObj k 1000 ... catch const bad_alloc b MessageUser out of memory exiting process throw Nevertheless..
|