c# Programming Glossary: trivially

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/127233/does-class-need-to-implement-ienumerable-to-use-foreach

EDIT In your case however you're out of luck. You can trivially wrap your object however to make it enumerable class EnumerableWrapper..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1502298/how-much-effort-is-required-to-convert-an-asmx-to-wcf-web-service

need to describe your DataContract classes but that it trivially simple too. I did this recently and it was a joy share improve..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2640738/c-sharp-cannot-implicitly-convert-type-listproduct-to-listiproduct

why this might be happening And I am sure it is something trivially simple c# interface compiler errors share improve this question..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2823236/creating-a-property-setter-delegate

extra candy to support. But the good news is that you can trivially take a get expression which the C# compiler can write and re..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3307275/how-do-i-generate-a-set-of-random-strings-in-a-c-sharp-program-so-that-they-are

set of random strings in a C# program so that they are not trivially predicted I faced a following problem generate N unique alphanumeric..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4505529/rx-iobservable-buffering-to-smooth-out-bursts-of-events

PS. I'm brand new to Rx so my apologies if this is a trivially simple question... 1. Simple yet flawed approach Here's my initial..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4584627/using-gethashcode-for-getting-enum-int-value

potentially be much slower since a constant GetHashCode trivially fulfills the contract but has bad distribution properties. ..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/491375/readonlycollection-or-ienumerable-for-exposing-member-collections

foos.Skip 0 There are plenty of other options for wrapping trivially the nice thing about Skip over Select Where is that there's..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/608110/is-it-possible-to-deserialize-xml-into-listt

share improve this question You can encapsulate the list trivially using System using System.Collections.Generic using System.Xml.Serialization..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/736900/the-deserializer-has-no-knowlege-of-any-type-that-maps-to-this-contract

usually no need to flatten them first since trees can be trivially expressed in xml. Do you really need to flatten it Example using..